Hey everyone. After much contemplation, I needed some clarification for this one.
(E) says the “province could keep its workers and use them more effectively, with a resulting savings of $600 million in its out-of-province expenditures.” I ...
Purpose of proving grounds: Designed to be so demanding that only those students most committed to being science majors will receive passing grades in these courses.
C: Designing introductory science courses to serve as proving grounds has ...
Pretty clueless on this one. I narrowed the answer to B or C during the exam, and I couldn't do any better during BR. Turns out, the answer is E :/ Can someone break down all of the answer choices? Even though I got rid of A and D, I'm not convinced ...
Can someone please explain to me why A is the correct answer but all others are wrong. I initially chose C, and I don't see how it's wrong.
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-03/
I am having a hard time understanding why E is correct while B is incorrect. Can someone help me understand this logic or frame of thought? Thank you
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-19/
This question went completely over my head and I still don't understand why the correct answer is (C) for all the tea in China. If someone could please explain this question it would be greatly appreciated!
I did not understand how and why he figured out which parts of the sentences he could use to make conditional statements from the video. He did not use conditional logic for the first sentence even though it had key words "not" and "are".
I get why (E) is the answer here, there's a flaw between the premise and sub-conclusion. Just because a majority are unaware doesn't necessarily mean they disprove of the attempt.
But I'm having a tough time eliminating (D). If we just isolate the ...
I'm confused how to write the conditional logic for this. Can somebody please explain this? When I see how the video skipped over labeling the first sentence like a premise, I got confused why he then uses it in conditional logic (TMU---> IASC)? I also ...
This was pretty tricky, and I got it right, but I still don’t have a good understanding of what is technically wrong with A. How is answer choice A not directly contradicting one of P’s premises? It must not because it isn’t the right answer choice. ...