http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-52-section-1-question-19/
I came to realize that my trouble with this question is that I mistakenly assumed a PREMISE (more likely to determine policy by electing officer than through direction vote) was a ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-2-passage-3-passage/
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-2-passage-3-questions/
Can anyone provide help with this question? I don't see at all how they get their answer.. ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-75-section-1-question-19
Hi everyone! I am really confused on this question.. I understand how the correct answer (B) explains why the average in the country as a whole went down, but I don't understand how ...
Can someone explain why C is wrong? I don't understand the reasoning for it. I think B is correct because if the amount of child passengers remain the same, then it indicates less deaths.
Okay, BR-group people, don't get at me for this one (though I won't blame you if you do)... but I missed this question in my personal blind review, which was before the 4/23 BR group and didn't catch it until afterwards. I initially selected "A" but ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-13/
I thought A is the correct answer because it sounds if most viewers started to watch the 1st episode of the program because of the network's ad, it sounds the ad had huge influence ...
Please someone explain to me why B is incorrect and A is correct. I don't understand in the slightest bit and I have read so many explanations but still don't get it. B seems to match the reasoning in the original statement.
https://7sage.com/ ...
Hi,
So I'm not sure about the correct answer C...
Why do we have to assume or compare the ancestors to Neanderthals? Why it's required?
Even though we know homo sapiens ancestors of contemporary humans was not significantly more ...
I watched the video.Yet I'm still stuck in (B). Any ideas and insight will be appreciated.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-70-section-1-question-23/
I'm hoping that someone might be willing to check my thinking/analysis before I go to the explanation. It has been suggested that if we write out an explanation for our thought process that it helps to solidify our learning. This is my attempt to follow ...
Hi guys! I wanted some insight into why A qualifies as a right answer for this question.
The argument is saying that the manager should be blamed/is responsible for the project's delay because he was aware that the contractor often runs late ...
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-65-section-1-question-19/
Help. That's all I can say. I do not see how answer choice C does anything to the argument even slightly.
Birds didn't eat at the feeders, so they got ate less and ...
I am having trouble with this question. I can see why the other 4 ACs are wrong but I am having trouble understanding why E is the correct answer. When negated, is E essentially saying that L comes AFTER the leaf litter becomes ...
Can anyone shed a little light on this one for me? I see now why the correct answer is correct but I chose C because I felt that it was blocking any alternate explanations for the prevented deaths. I thought that taking more trips and the total time in ...
Can anyone explain why the answer choice (c) is the correct answer? It's hard to see why this has to be the case when logs already have each ring representing one year. With this fact, it's already possible to know how old these ...
I have some questions about this Q. Some of the information I'm presenting about this question I've only understood after reading forum boards (I don't have access to JYs explanation for this PT) but I still have a question.
I don't understand how A can be the answer.
A says "no evidence in favor of a hypothesis," but the proponents of the hypothesis is giving us evidence. He explains the fossil thing etc how come this doesn't count as evidence backing up his claim? < ...
would some one please help me understand how to properly translate answer choice E into formal logic? i have some idea from the discussion in the video explanation, but im having issues identifying the cues that led to these translations.