I diagrammed it and got K-->LS,O----> H Then for conclusion K--->H when doing all this how do I get to D? I ended up picking E because I knew it couldnt be D (terrible logic i know)
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-46-section-2- ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-2-question-16/
This question is so hard! Can anyone explain this? What is the meaning of "they otherwise" in the last sentence? Why does J.Y mention contemporary artist exist or does not exist? I am ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-61-section-2-question-23/
So in JY's explanation the stimulus represents invalid argument form 4. But I'm having trouble seeing this. Had the second sentence read "most BRICK houses on river street with front ...
http://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-18-section-2-question-23/
I'm having trouble translating the "not until" statement. Until is "negate sufficient" but the "not" cancels the negation from the until rule so then it reads just like an if then. Is ...
I'm not sure why 1) negating morally right to mean morally wrong is incorrect and 2) negating right to mean wrong is incorrect. Please explain!
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-june-2007-section-2-question-23
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-2-question-02/
Does the stimulus in this question illustrate a causal relationship between the Sumerian's inability to support agriculture and its collapse? I'm wondering if the second to last ...
Ok so I'm doing my blind review, and when I initially did the test I chose the correct answer even though I wasn't happy with it because it seemed more like a sufficient assumption to me. I don't have the ultimate package so I don't have the explanation ...
I have problems for this question.
The question stem mentions the preference in Passage A:
Preference for coherence connecting variety, not too simple (pure tone) = not interesting; not too complex = bad
...
I got it right. But I don't know why J.Y said we can can make "some" statement by contrapositive. The relationship is about "all" statement.
https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-34-section-2-question-23/
Any idea?
I am retaking some of the 70's PT's to get ready for Saturday (fingers crossed!). Most of the LR is no problem for me, I just was hoping for a bit of a discussion on a few questions, maybe someone can critique my reasoning? So here it is:
So I got this one wrong and picked C when A is the correct AC. It's just not clicking for me how this is correct. Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Im in the middle of BRing and i like AC E bc how does the author know that having so much artwork that can satisfy every taste imaginable will affect someones aesthetic fulfilment.
But AC D... does the author have to assume there is such a scenario? ...
This question took me a lot of time but i still dont get why A is the answer because in A arent we affirming the consequent which is a conditional logic error ( if x then y - all poor then honest ; if y then x - all honest if poor )???
I am putting this question out there, because after flagging this question and blind reviewing, I still got it wrong.
Currently, I am blind reviewing my process to improve my LR form, and I am also blind reviewing to address any gaps in ...
For this question: https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-72-section-2-question-02/
Why can’t B be correct? The stimulus just says toxic levels, then collapse, suggesting toxic levels are what caused the collapse, but it could just be a ...