I second @"Nilesh S"
I'm pretty sure it would be against rules to post actual screenshots of the stimulus. But if you use referencing such as "PT 35 S1 Q15" and then post your question about it, then it should be alright.
@jac376 said:
Flaw: The correlation of Ra, C, and (C --> Rh) does not mean there is a causation from C to Ra. The answer which strengthens this argument will show that (Rh --> Ra) (C causes Ra because it causes Rh which causes Ra) or directly ...
While you're waiting for the awesome video explanations, if anyone wants to BR PT76 or discuss some questions from PT76 before the December exam, just pm me and let me know!
We want an answer that contradicts the stimulus, not one that is irrelevant. The stimulus essentially states that if you’re restricting, then you preventing negative effects. TO contradict that,we negate it: Restricting AND not preventing negative effects. ...
I'm still doing whole PTs (one Friday) and maybe one Saturday as well because they help me chill. It's something to do and my test is Sunday. PT76 just arrived this week for me so I thought I'd just do it.