... 3-22, the Paradox-Except question. The first layer of difficulty ... />
The first lesson this question provided me was not to ... />
The next lesson this question taught me what was both ... />
Lesson #2 this question taught me: you are going ...
For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... questions if I had a bank of time left, etc. I ... a slight dash under a question to review under BR b ... revisit the explanation, circle the Question number that I am about ... entire thought process for every question that I was confident but ...
... other 7sagers on tackling Flaw question types.
I have gone ... improve with these question types. Ive noticed these question types appear quite ...
I am done with the curriculum, though I am sure I will revisit it. However, I was planning on going through the LSAT trainer first before doing more PTs. My question is if anybody did that already, did you see your score improve after LSAT trainer?
Quick question: If I attended a community college over one summer in undergrad and took 2 classes that are reflected on my main school's transcript, is it necessary for me to request a transcript from the community college as well?