Yeah, that makes sense, but we've all seen PT's were a question has been "removed from scoring". Is this not an indication that the question was indeed flawed?
Haha. That is really funny. Never noticed that ambiguity before, but both ways seem like perfectly legitimate readings. I bet a lot of folks were pissed that one didn’t get removed from scoring!
To my understanding, this happens when there is a discrepancy found in the answer and someone has challenged it and so when LSAC sees they've erred, that question is removed from scoring and thus removed from the PTs.
@TheLoftGuy was there stories of stolen test this cycle?
I feel like im going crazy imagine waking up tomorrow with a letter from LSAC saying we all have to rewrite because and entire virus game was removed from scoring or something
... their potential. If they are scoring better maybe it just means ... 't study much. If you removed all the folks who don ... unfair advantage that explains the scoring gap, then we wouldn't ...
... their potential. If they are scoring better maybe it just means ... 't study much. If you removed all the folks who don ... unfair advantage that explains the scoring gap, then we wouldn't ...
... question on PT 86 was removed from scoring. It has been a ... which have had a question removed on the official test have ... other tests with a question removed and you will see that ...
My understanding is that for some reason LawHub still uses questions that are removed from scoring, as the question you are referring to isn't in the officially released preptest.