For LR clearly. When you see a question involves heavy Lawgic say MBT MBF Parallel reasoning etc.. Do you start mapping the lawgic right away or read it first then read it again and Map it out?
Not all X are Y. Is this translated as X some (not)Y? Also, is Not all X are Y equivalent to X some Y? For the latter question, I know in English in certain contexts, the statement "not all" of something implies "some are."
... other 7sagers on tackling Flaw question types.
I have gone ... improve with these question types. Ive noticed these question types appear quite ...
... either suck terribly at the SA questions during the PT process ... . I have pulled SA questions from the question bank and plan on ... on how they improved on SA questions. JY basically said these ... . It had a lot of SA questions (more than usual) and ...
I am done with the curriculum, though I am sure I will revisit it. However, I was planning on going through the LSAT trainer first before doing more PTs. My question is if anybody did that already, did you see your score improve after LSAT trainer?
Quick question: If I attended a community college over one summer in undergrad and took 2 classes that are reflected on my main school's transcript, is it necessary for me to request a transcript from the community college as well?
... ) of the trainer, the last question of the second scenario brings ... in out and the last question of the drill says "If ... if this is a silly question!