In a recent study of arthritis, researchers tried but failed to find any correlation between pain intensity and any of those features of the weather—humidity, temperature swings, barometric pressure—usually cited by arthritis sufferers as the cause of their increased pain. Those arthritis sufferers in the study who were convinced of the existence of such a correlation gave widely varying accounts of the time delay between the occurrence of what they believed to be the relevant feature of the weather and the increased intensity of the pain. Thus, this study _______.

Summary
The stimulus discusses a study where researchers tried and failed to find any correlation between pain intensity in arthritis sufferers and various weather features (humidity, temperature swings, barometric pressure). Arthritis sufferers in the study who believed in such a correlation gave widely varying accounts of the time delay between the weather change and the increased pain.

Strongly Supported Conclusions
There is no correlation between weather features and pain intensity.

A
indicates that the weather affects some arthritis sufferers more quickly than it does other arthritis sufferers
This is too strong to support. There is no indication that the weather impacts pain intensity at all, much less that it impacts some more quickly than others.
B
indicates that arthritis sufferers’ beliefs about the causes of the pain they feel may affect their assessment of the intensity of that pain
This is a tricky answer choice, but it is too strong to support. You have to make an assumption that the arthritis sufferers are correct. There is no support that the beliefs about their pain impact the assessment of that pain.
C
suggests that arthritis sufferers are imagining the correlation they assert to exist
The argument's premises (that there is no correlation and widely varying accounts) support the conclusion that this perceived correlation is imaginary. Remember, your job is to complete THIS argument, not provide assumptions to lead to another conclusion.
D
suggests that some people are more susceptible to weather-induced arthritis pain than are others
The stimulus says that there is no correlation.
E
suggests that the scientific investigation of possible links between weather and arthritis pain is impossible
This is too strong to support. The stimulus only says that there is no correlation, not that such correlation is impossible.

72 comments

Sociologist: A recent study of 5,000 individuals found, on the basis of a physical exam, that more than 25 percent of people older than 65 were malnourished, though only 12 percent of the people in this age group fell below government poverty standards. In contrast, a greater percentage of the people 65 or younger fell below poverty standards than were found in the study to be malnourished.

"Surprising" Phenomenon

People older than 65 are more likely to be malnourished than live in poverty, yet people younger than 65 are more likely to live in poverty than be malnourished.

Objective

The correct answer must offer an unsatisfactory hypothesis, one that fails to explain the differences between age groups. Every wrong answer, meanwhile, will resolve this discrepancy by stating a difference between people older than 65 and people younger than 65. This difference will result in a greater proportion of the older group being malnourished, a greater proportion of the younger group living in poverty, or both.

A
Doctors are less likely to correctly diagnose and treat malnutrition in their patients who are over 65 than in their younger patients.

This would explain the discrepancy. Younger people are more likely to live in poverty than be malnourished because they are more likely to receive treatment for malnourishment than older people.

B
People over 65 are more likely to take medications that increase their need for certain nutrients than are people 65 or younger.

This would explain the discrepancy. If people over 65 are more likely to need additional nutrients, their relative undernourishment is unsurprising.

C
People over 65 are more likely to suffer from loss of appetite due to medication than are people 65 or younger.

This would explain the discrepancy. If people over 65 are more likely to lose their appetite, they are likely to eat less and therefore be relatively undernourished.

D
People 65 or younger are no more likely to fall below government poverty standards than are people over 65.

This is a similarity between the groups and cannot explain their different outcomes. If people in both groups are equally likely to live in poverty, then people over 65 are more than twice as likely to be malnourished as people under 65, which is unexplained.

E
People 65 or younger are less likely to have medical conditions that interfere with their digestion than are people over 65.

This would explain the discrepancy. Younger people are more likely to have healthy digestion, making them more likely to fully absorb the nutrients in their food and thus less likely to be malnourished.


19 comments