LSAT 116 – Section 3 – Question 10
You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.
Target time: 1:20
This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds
Question QuickView |
Type | Tags | Answer Choices |
Curve | Question Difficulty |
Psg/Game/S Difficulty |
Explanation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PT116 S3 Q10 |
+LR
| Strengthen +Streng Link Assumption +LinkA | A
8%
158
B
88%
164
C
1%
153
D
2%
155
E
1%
151
|
129 141 152 |
+Easier | 146.244 +SubsectionMedium |
Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis
The author concludes that gravity is a property of space itself. Her evidence is that photons and neutrinos emitted by a distant supernova all reached Earth at the same time.
Notable Assumptions
The author believes that the neutrinos and photons wouldn’t have all reached Earth at the same time unless gravity was a property of space itself. The author therefore assumes that objects moving at uniform speed through space signifies that gravity is a property of space.
A
Einstein predicted that photons and neutrinos emitted by any one supernova would reach Earth simultaneously.
We don’t care if Einstein predicted the premise. We’re trying to strengthen the connection between that premise and the conclusion: that gravity is an aspect of space.
B
If gravity is not a property of space itself, then photons and neutrinos emitted simultaneously by a distant event will reach Earth at different times.
Unless gravity was a property of space, then the photons and neutrinos would’ve reached Earth at different times. Since they reached Earth at the same time, gravity must be a property of space.
C
Photons and neutrinos emitted by distant events would be undetectable on Earth if Einstein’s claim that gravity is a property of space itself were correct.
We don’t care about whether photons and neutrinos are undetectable. Besides, those photons and neutrinos evidently were detectable, yet the author argues Einstein’s claim is correct.
D
Photons and neutrinos were the only kinds of particles that reached Earth from the supernova.
We don’t care. There could’ve been other particles the author chose not to mention.
E
Prior to the simultaneous arrival of photons and neutrinos from the supernova, there was no empirical evidence for Einstein’s claim that gravity is a property of space itself.
We don’t care when Einstein’s claim was given empirical weight. We’re trying to strengthen the connection between the particles reaching Earth at the same time and gravity being a property of space.
Take PrepTest
Review Results
LSAT PrepTest 116 Explanations
Section 1 - Reading Comprehension
- Passage 1 – Passage
- Passage 1 – Questions
- Passage 2 – Passage
- Passage 2 – Questions
- Passage 3 – Passage
- Passage 3 – Questions
- Passage 4 – Passage
- Passage 4 – Questions
Section 2 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
Section 3 - Logical Reasoning
- Question 01
- Question 02
- Question 03
- Question 04
- Question 05
- Question 06
- Question 07
- Question 08
- Question 09
- Question 10
- Question 11
- Question 12
- Question 13
- Question 14
- Question 15
- Question 16
- Question 17
- Question 18
- Question 19
- Question 20
- Question 21
- Question 22
- Question 23
- Question 24
- Question 25
- Question 26
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment. You can get a free account here.