LSAT 116 – Section 3 – Question 10

Sign up to star your favorites LSAT 116 - Section 3 - Question 10

June 2004

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Target time: 1:20

This is question data from the 7Sage LSAT Scorer. You can score your LSATs, track your results, and analyze your performance with pretty charts and vital statistics - all with a Free Account ← sign up in less than 10 seconds

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve This gives you an idea of how this question is “curved”— in other words, what level of scorer is likely to get this question right. It shows a model of scaled LSAT score vs probability of getting the question correct. It is based on student test results for each question. The gray bar extends from the score for a 25% chance, to the score for a 75% chance of getting the question correct. The black line in the middle is the score for a 50% chance of getting the question correct. The percentage at the right is the expected chance of someone with the same score as you on that PrepTest getting that question correct	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation

Question QuickView	Type	Tags	Answer Choices	Curve This gives you an idea of how this question is “curved”— in other words, what level of scorer is likely to get this question right. It shows a model of scaled LSAT score vs probability of getting the question correct. It is based on student test results for each question. The gray bar extends from the score for a 25% chance, to the score for a 75% chance of getting the question correct. The black line in the middle is the score for a 50% chance of getting the question correct. The percentage at the right is the expected chance of someone with the same score as you on that PrepTest getting that question correct	Question Difficulty	Psg/Game/S Difficulty	Explanation
PT116 S3 Q10	+LR	Strengthen +Streng Link Assumption +LinkA	A 8% 158 B 88% 164 C 1% 153 D 2% 155 E 1% 151	129 141 152	+Easier	146.244 +SubsectionMedium

Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries

First Previous1Next Last

Recently, photons and neutrinos emitted by a distant supernova, an explosion of a star, reached Earth at virtually the same time. This finding supports Einstein’s claim that gravity is a property of space itself, in the sense that a body exerts gravitational pull by curving the space around it. The simultaneous arrival of the photons and neutrinos is evidence that the space through which they traveled was curved.

Summarize Argument: Phenomenon-Hypothesis

The author concludes that gravity is a property of space itself. Her evidence is that photons and neutrinos emitted by a distant supernova all reached Earth at the same time.

Notable Assumptions

The author believes that the neutrinos and photons wouldn’t have all reached Earth at the same time unless gravity was a property of space itself. The author therefore assumes that objects moving at uniform speed through space signifies that gravity is a property of space.

Einstein predicted that photons and neutrinos emitted by any one supernova would reach Earth simultaneously.

We don’t care if Einstein predicted the premise. We’re trying to strengthen the connection between that premise and the conclusion: that gravity is an aspect of space.

If gravity is not a property of space itself, then photons and neutrinos emitted simultaneously by a distant event will reach Earth at different times.

Unless gravity was a property of space, then the photons and neutrinos would’ve reached Earth at different times. Since they reached Earth at the same time, gravity must be a property of space.

Photons and neutrinos emitted by distant events would be undetectable on Earth if Einstein’s claim that gravity is a property of space itself were correct.

We don’t care about whether photons and neutrinos are undetectable. Besides, those photons and neutrinos evidently were detectable, yet the author argues Einstein’s claim is correct.

Photons and neutrinos were the only kinds of particles that reached Earth from the supernova.

We don’t care. There could’ve been other particles the author chose not to mention.

Prior to the simultaneous arrival of photons and neutrinos from the supernova, there was no empirical evidence for Einstein’s claim that gravity is a property of space itself.

We don’t care when Einstein’s claim was given empirical weight. We’re trying to strengthen the connection between the particles reaching Earth at the same time and gravity being a property of space.

LSAT 116 – Section 3 – Question 10

Sign up to star your favorites LSAT 116 - Section 3 - Question 10

You need a full course to see this video. Enroll now and get started in less than a minute.

Take PrepTest

Review Results

LSAT PrepTest 116 Explanations

Section 1 - Reading Comprehension

Section 2 - Logical Reasoning

Section 3 - Logical Reasoning

Section 4 - Reading Comprehension

Leave a Reply Cancel