Subscription pricing
michaelbagh03629
Looking for a few study partners (Scoring in the high 160s - Taking the September LSAT)
Would be down to hop on zoom and do some drill questions !
PT Questions
michaelbagh03629
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
michaelbagh03629
Tuesday, Apr 22 2025
michaelbagh03629
Saturday, Apr 05 2025
I had the same exact thought process lol
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Apr 02 2025
probably yuno miles
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Apr 02 2025
The breaking of a law does not justify incarceration...
Why?
Because:
"It is unreasonable to incarcerate anyone for any other reason than that he or she is a serious threat to the property or lives of other people."
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Apr 02 2025
Isn't the first sentence the one GIVING support to the second sentence which RECIEVES the support, making the first sentence a premise/sub-conclusion?
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Mar 12 2025
"ignore" and "fail to consider" are NOT the same thing and I'm not letting the lsat writers and 7sage gaslight me into thinking they are idc
for example, me ignoring the importance of studying for an exam is NOT the same as me failing to consider the importance of studying for an exam. in one case, I'm AWARE of the importance of studying, whereas in the other I FAILED to consider aka am unaware of the importance of studying. how is that the same??
michaelbagh03629
Sunday, Mar 09 2025
I've had this issue as well and what's really helped is I change my answer ONLY if I am 100% sure I got it wrong and I know for a fact which one is correct. Anytime I'm not completely certain I trust my gut.
michaelbagh03629
Saturday, Mar 08 2025
#feedback for less commonly used words such as "deleterious," it would be helpful for you guys to actually define the word before you start using it, as a lot of people probably don't know its exact meaning.
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Mar 05 2025
nah im actually so cooked
michaelbagh03629
Tuesday, Mar 04 2025
I understand that technically speaking the definition of "un" is "not," but they should make a seperate lesson with the negation of "un_" words for clarification. Many will interpret the negation of uncomftorable as "not uncomfortable" in cases like these, which seems to be the case here since a lot of people got it wrong. For example, if somebody says one is not unintelligent, the vast majority would not immediately imply that therefore they are intelligent. What if they are neither unintelligent nor intelligent and just have an average IQ?
michaelbagh03629
Tuesday, Mar 04 2025
How is B irrelevant if the survey in the passage focuses on THE PERCEPTION of employees on their job security. If they think almost EVERYBODY has job security, can't you make a reasonable assumption that they just have a FLAWED PERCEPTION and thats why the survey results DIDN'T change DESPITE Mergers, Reengineering, and Downsizing. Why is that not a fair hypothesis to make? You guys have a tendancy on certain answer choices to just quickly and casually gloss over it as if it can ONLY mean one thing and it's 100% straight forward.
michaelbagh03629
Tuesday, Mar 04 2025
I'm so tired of this blind review method. My score drops nearly every time I use blind review and I'm supposed to think it's here to help lol.
michaelbagh03629
Monday, Mar 03 2025
But the passage does not state they "must work alone," it states they "must be ALLOWED" to work alone. Therefore, dosen't that mean they are simply given the CHOICE to work alone or with others?
michaelbagh03629
Monday, Mar 03 2025
#feedback All due respect but the explanation here is really weak and directly contradicts your own curriculum. You made it explicitly clear that THE NEGATION of a claim DOES NOT mean opposite. So how can we assume that "uncomftorable" can be negated to "comftorable." Based on your OWN logic, shouldn't it mean not uncomftorable? You guys should reword the negation lessons if you don't want people to get confused on questions like these.
michaelbagh03629
Sunday, Mar 02 2025
All this blind review method is doing is making me doubt my own CORRECT intuition. Every single time I blind review I end overcomplicating things and changing my CORRECT answer to a wrong one. Do you guys not consider that it may just cause doubt in students such as myself?
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Feb 26 2025
this was answered 5 seconds after I commented lol
michaelbagh03629
Wednesday, Feb 26 2025
isn't most a way of saying the majority? so shouldn't we automatically know at least half of the jedi set intersects with the powerful set?
michaelbagh03629
Sunday, Feb 16 2025
#feedback For question 5, I think a more accurate answer would be "what they had been accustomed to maintaining" vs. "what they ended up maintaining." The answer you stated ("now') is confusing as the question does not imply that the 59% maintained a lower temperature right now. Why can't it be about a past event?
So I would switch the answer if I was you guys to avoid confusing the viewer.
michaelbagh03629
Saturday, Feb 15 2025
#feedback This section is much more confusing particularly regarding the difference between predicate-objects and modifiers. In question 3, Mary's quote is considered to be apart of the predicate as the object of the sentence, but in the last lesson you directly said that one question to identify modifiers is by asking "What?" Mary's quote is the "what?" of the sentence yet you said its apart of the predicate. Hope this made sense and where the confusion stems from.
michaelbagh03629
Friday, Feb 14 2025
For question 5, I personally interpreted "Since none of them have have devised a suitable recylcing or disposal plan" as a premise for “But this is not a sustainable, long term solution,” which I interpreted as the sub-conclusion of the argument. And I interpreted both of these claims as premises for the main conclusion, which is the last sentence. Is this a flawed way of looking at it? Because in an earlier lesson, it was stated that a claim which both gives and recieves support is either a sub conclusion or a major premise.
#fuckRC