• Failing a sufficient condition doesn't mean they cannot meet the necessary condition 

• Failing a necessary condition does mean that they cannot meet the sufficient condition 

• Meeting a sufficient condition does mean that they meet the necessary condition 

• Meeting a necessary condition does not mean that they meet the sufficient condition 

the butterfly can fly around the necessary condition circle and make his way down south he doesn't have to be a bird

@SadieIgoe I don't know if I made this specific enough the original two concepts would be "/chosen and brave." We keep the "no" as a negation since we are using group 3 indicator rules

@BrockFreeman In the conditional logic module he said if there is also "unless" in the sentence you should follow the group 3 indicator rules. So negating the sufficient condition: chosen for gryffindor--> brave or /brave --> /chosen for gryffindor

New module guys let's go

3/3 I am the Wizard

@Marcus Tsang Goat

noo I got stuck inside the hut for #5

@ramrob2k12 Haha 67

Denying/negating the relationship means the sufficient condition can exist without the necessary condition

New module guys let's go

Aw this actually was so cute Brad is the goat

let's go guys

@Iman U could try rewording it. When knowledge of food is an element of grocery shopping, this knowledge is established if a person has tried different cuisines, unless they are employed at the grocery store.

Rule: If different cuisines --> knowledge established.

Exception: employed.

If they fall into exception of "employed at the grocery store", the rule "if they've tried different cuisines, the knowledge of food (as an element of grocery shopping) is established," doesn't apply. They're employed at the grocery store, so they don't need to follow the rule of trying different cuisines to have knowledge of different foods. And vice versa for falling outside the exception. Obviously this isn't as like factually sound as the original one but I'm just copying the sentence structure to make the language simpler

If we can still see the conditional relationship, I don't understand why we even have to tease out the domain. I don't understand the purpose

The ume fails the necessary condition (blooming for 3+ months) so it must fail the sufficient condition (amenable to tastes)

@YiquiaraM Haha same

@komododragon Thank youu

New voice

Are these indicators also underinclusive?

5/5 finally i was waiting to be able to say this

Haha he's talking so fast he's locked in

Wow i was thinking it has been a long time since a skill builder and it's the next section. I am the wizard

@Que Okay thank you! You as well!

@ABlocker Okay thank you! I will continue on :)