yuuuppppppp

:(

Wow i used the same percentages in my example as he did. we are connected

We can do this 7sagers. let's sage this section🔥

@epayne17 "answer choice"

i would take the surgeon up on that offer

ate that

i'm up

goodbye to these horrendous questions

@SadieIgoe We are concluding that they would save money, so to reach this conclusion, we need to confirm that there's nothing PREVENTING us from it. If there are costs working against us saving money, the conclusion (and argument) falls apart. The negation of B is saying, "well, what if the generators can't ALWAYS convert heat into energy?" This doesn't matter as much because we can still reach the conclusion that if it's possible in any way, they will save money. If the heat --> electricity is achievable, they'll save money. In turn, C is saying okay, it's possible, but there's a whole new cost that would prevent us from saving money. At least that is what I thought when I chose C

i am the wizard of this question

negation technique is goated for these

i just said a) happiness is more important than acquiring health b) sacrificing health leads to no happiness, so c) you should never sacrifice health to acquire money

when i get these right it's like seeing sunlight for the first time

forever together biconditional <3

i wish we had rewards like confetti or happy music

@JoyelleBaek period girl

i atee this

5/5 i'm so done with this section that was my cue to move on

@SadieIgoe nevermind there's a drill

goodbye to this section

i liked that they did this little recap. we are all on this journey together

lately i've been the Wizard of these questions

once i started zoning on the conclusion/hypothesis it was a lot easier for me to eliminate answers

argument is ignoring another factor that could cause skin cancer and jumping to conclusion that sunscreen must be evil