17 comments

  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    OKAY THEN. Let's not.

    5
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    4
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    3
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    @adamwegh37

    "Pretty sure that's not a picture of you rather it is a picture taken of a young man during a challenging time in his life"

    What is your point? Are you implying I posted it because it was a troubling time in X persons life? Just because a picture can be taken as one thing does not mean that is the only interpretation/meaning of the photo.

    Does everyone who post a picture of Hitler support the Nazis? Surely not it can be shown for a multitude of reasons. Does my picture above show him in a challenging time? Sure. That is far from the reason I posted it however.

    "And if I'm not mistaken this was a serious post about an LSAT picture, and you brought mockery of another person's shortcomings into it."

    You are not mistaken, this was a serious post. Who are you referencing in the second half you your post? Johnny Manziel or the original poster? The purpose of the picture was that it seems to do just about everything you should not do in your LSAT photo. Multiple people in the photo? Check. No clear picture of a face, Check. More than just shoulders and up, Check.

    Subtextually, the photo was to reinforce what others previously stated. The OP's photo looks perfect and appears to meet all of the LSAT requirements.

    "Wouldn't be very nice if someone posted a picture of a different person with an obvious handicap or disability as a joke."

    I agee. What does this have to do with anything?

    "Robbing banks isn't nice!"

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    @adamwegh37 Pretty sure that's not a picture of you rather it is a picture taken of a young man during a challenging time in his life

    I think that's Johnny Manziel, no? Reverse google search on the picture brings him up. He's a popular football player.

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    Pretty sure that's not a picture of you rather it is a picture taken of a young man during a challenging time in his life. And if I'm not mistaken this was a serious post about an LSAT picture, and you brought mockery of another person's shortcomings into it. Wouldn't be very nice if someone posted a picture of a different person with an obvious handicap or disability as a joke.

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    @adamwegh37 Why?

    0
  • Wednesday, Aug 24 2016

    I figured as much. Just wasn't very nice.

    1
  • Tuesday, Aug 23 2016

    @bondo007man235 Lmao. TFW you are rolling up a 20 to sniff a line in the bar, haha!

    2
  • Tuesday, Aug 23 2016

    @adamwegh37 no, does not meet requirements.

    I think he was joking around. :)

    1
  • Tuesday, Aug 23 2016

    @bondo007man235 - no, does not meet requirements.

    1
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    Will this picture work for me?

    7
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    @att88103 Let's just say that's a necessary condition that I don't want to fail.

    LMAO! There is no question in my mind now that you got this :)

    0
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    @gregoryalexanderdevine723 thanks so much man!

    If all who write the LSAT have a photo that meets the requirement, then

    WLSAT -------> PMR

    Let's just say that's a necessary condition that I don't want to fail.

    1
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    Looks perfect! No shadow, there isn't a random girl in the picture with you, you aren't wearing sunglasses...... Yup, looks like you followed all the rules from the LSAC page of photo requirements. :)

    2
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    You're good!

    1
  • Monday, Aug 22 2016

    Yep, looks totally fine

    1

Confirm action

Are you sure?