My video isn't playing any suggestions?

Does 7 Sage adjust the question level based on what your goal score is? I had all 3 star or above questions even though I got 10/13

How is answer choice D supported at all in the passage?

Can someone clarify "If the author doesn’t support any explanation but criticizes someone else’s explanation, the main point is the shortcomings of that explanation."

One way to speed up this question that helped me was understanding that the two conditionals had to involve rooms that being the laboratory and the regular room.From there you can narrow it down even quicker

@ReneBarseghian "It probably does" is the conclusion after the question in the first sentence was posed. You have to remember "it" is referring to something and that something is the question from the first sentence. As such everything after that conclusion is a premise to support the conclusion. It can't be the conclusion because what support does it garner from the other sentences. I hope this helps.

If there is a new term in the argument like in SA can we assume that the answer would have that new term in it?

Can someone simplify why this is necessary. I feel as though the explanation isn't simplifying this enough.

I got this right but was unable to determine why the other answer choices are wrong

Grammar made me get this wrong!!!

Can someone simplify B and how it weakens the analogy

My problem is if I took all day to build out the chain then I could get the question right but we won't have that time on the test. Has anyone noticed a increase of recognizing chains without having to write it out after building out the chains?

I am really struggling with this section

My brain works backwards for these questions for some reason. Can someone simplify the relationship between the conclusion and the answer choices for me?

Took me a while for number 1 but the question stem is super huge in understanding why d is correct. The goal for the question is truly to figure out how we can take these two things that seem to be opposing one another and come up with a valid resolution.

This one felt too good to be true in terms of the explanation compared to the others. I got it right so won't say much.

@Catpop It does as it implies that due to car jackers keeping the cars for longer. This would imply that they are caught more often despite the frequency of thefts going down which would result in more convictions. I hope this helps.

I got the answer correct but for some reason I always go to the other answers and try to find reason for them being wrong and increase my time

I got it right on the Blind review but this question hurt my brain

5/5 light weight baby!!!

@ConqueringLSAT Explicit means it's stated in the passage but implicit means we are assuming what is being conveyed.

What role does the that in the beginning of the sentence play other than making the sentence harder to read?

Anchor yourself to the stimulus. Don't use your knowledge but use the claims to help support your thought process behind the correct answer choice. If you have to fill in too many holes chances are the answer is not valid.

5/5 last two were a little difficult in determining what the main conclusion was but once I confirmed them was able to pick an answer. I would emphasize not worrying about time now and focusing on really understanding the format of how these stimulus are laid out. Once you get that down the timing should start to come down.

How would be prove this causal relationship?