they think they're real clever with that "the only", huh...

@amygao i think the idea is that recognizing these patterns will eventually become second nature while reading LSAT questions. the "translation" happens in your head

this took forever, but 5/5!

5/5!

4/5, #2 tripped me up

i was trying to say something like:

planetary society will be endangered -> impacts from space

but i kinda missed that the question was trying to make a distinction between planetary society and other forms of society.

1. when

2. zombies attack NYC, real estate market crash

3. z, r

4. z -> r

5. /r - > /z or if the real estate market does not crash, zombies will not have attacked nyc

i felt compelled to change the tense when flipping and negating for some reason

last one hurt my head bro

i'm tired

4: why not

Subject: The formation

Predicate-verb: is

Predicate-object: triggered?

2/3. I think I need to take more time for now but I was still 30 seconds over on 2 questions

0/1

The Disney argument has accounted for every possibility. In the world set up by this argument, it is impossible for Walt to have done anything other than offered 10 goats to Mickey.

The tiger argument offers one example that supports the claim that not every mammal is suitable to keep as a pet. In other words, we have one reason to believe the claim. The reason is undeniable - we know tigers are aggressive - but it is not as strongly supported as the Disney argument.

The trash bin argument's premise is flawed. The cat being on the counter licking his paw could be completely coincidental. Maybe he just ate the food he is actually allowed to eat and then migrated to the counter. Maybe he's licking his paw just because he felt like it. You are making a leap in logic if you assume this evidence definitively proves the cat knocked over the trash bin.