The hardest part of some LSAT questions to me is that sometimes the choices they give you are horrible. It feels like the actual rigth answer isnt there. So i waste time trying to find which choice either follows my logic or is closest to what the clear right answer is.

for me as an old folk student that joined the work force instead of going right into law school from gradschool, this question made me so annoyed to read through. In the work place i wouldve just wrtitten a big question mark on it and handed it back to whatever schlemiel wrote it and told them to rewrite it.

These were way harder questions than the practice ones :/

i was so shocked I got this right and only 11 seconds ove time that I sceamed, called it lunch break, and made a sandwich.

Lmao on my 'low res summary' for Fayes paragraph i literally just have "F= 'lol thats dumb'" so im glad that came in handy later.

I loved this more of this plz

i cry

brb googling "deleterious"... smh...

tag yourself, i am the rogue s at the very bottom of this page

Why isnt there a drill for this section?

bro this took me 7 full minuets to get

Not that i am not gaining a ton out of these classes - but does anyone else sometimes skip or pause the videos early if you find the explanation is over explaning or like causing you to overthink the solution?

this section has showed me i would kill this test if only i wasnt such a slow reader

Y'all this is one of those 'i am on a debate club debating the most random, cognitive dissonant side ever, but i hate Chad who is captain of the other argument side - so imma smoke him' questions.

lol i had to do a dirty google and figure out wth 'social inertia' is...

Justice for Jocko

Wondering when yall move on? I feel pretty good on these questions, struggling with the excepts but otherwise got all the other questions right in this section. My general rule is if i get 3/5 i can move to the next module or do one more drill, so i dont run out of study days without seeing everything - wondering if thatw what yall do or do yall drill until you get a perfect set of five?

lmao not kevin putting all these one bubble questions at the end of this lesson so we dont give up on our law careers

The answer choices for this question were... professionally speaking... cheeks

meh... imma just... get this one wrong i guess then

whenever i get a question right i feel like the GIF of Tina from bobs burgers doing the body roll.

the people demand more shark questions kevin...

I feel like the Detective paragraph doesnt work in this example. The fake stimulus doesnt say "a" metric or "The major metric", it says "THE" metric. Meaning this is the way this fake PD works. The niave assumption pitfall doesnt work here because of grammar considerations alone - youre not making an assumption here because the selector is excluding all other factors of success like a weighting criteria or difficulty level criteria. You would literally be having to break the rule presented at the top of the page to not be skeptical. "Your job is to explain the facts, not to deny the facts." it literally says toward the middle.

I grew up in law enforcement and even have two parents that were career detectives, my immediate thought was that some cases are harder than others and are almost 'weighted' differently. But you wouldnt be able to use that train of thought given the rules laid out here and the way this fake stiulus is written.

Does anyone else sometiems feel llike they dont see all the questions until they retake or do blind review? D is so clearly the answer but i dont remember seeing it before i went back to review.

im using this as a riddle at the netx cook out with the bois