Subscription pricing
Not sure if anyone else feels like this, but I believe 7Sage’s decision to remove LG from CCv2 does a disservice to those who were currently using it to take the LSAT before August 2024.
I have been using CCv2 for its streamlined approach to LR. Now, I have to go back and forth between two different versions to access LG and new LR. I also have different sets of completion progress data due to using CCv2 for the majority of my studies. Not sure if this is unique to my profile, but it is very jarring and stressful to see sometimes. I’m not sure if this is just me and I should get used to it? Any tips?
Is it possible for 7Sage to include a CCv3 (CCv2+LG) or a feature that disables the logic games section for new LSAT test takers?
22
17 comments
Hi admins,
Stumbled upon this discussion post and I would also like the LG section added to my CCV2 syllabus. Can any admin please assist this asap?
@davidbusis895 @cherry641 @marynuez206
please disregard, I see the logic games section in CV2. instead, are we not able to get a "logic games" heading that tells us the number of lessons we completed and the %?
Thank you so much for listening. I really appreciate 7Sage for promptly responding to student feedback. @davidbusis895
Also, a big thank you to the student service reps for their help in resolving this issue. @cherry641 @marynuez206
Thanks @davidbusis895 Really grateful 7sage listens and put games back
@aiayala428 I completely agree. idk if im making a big deal out of nothing but im super frustrated that im paying nearly $100 monthly (CAD) for a service that is now pretty inconvenient
Hi everyone,
We heard your feedback and added Logic Games back to Core Curriculum Version 2. Thank you for using 7Sage, and please continue to give us feedback! We always want to do what's right for you.
Happy logic gaming! (It was also my favorite section back in the day.)
@cherry641
Users, who are paying for this service, shouldn't have to suddenly accommodate and manually "skip" hours of built-in material to adhere to their original study setup/plan. CCv2 was better BECAUSE "pre-made Problem Sets in CC V1 which were removed in CC V2 because the Drill feature is better"
Why should we suddenly have to navigate between two different website versions and have to manually skip or ignore hours of video to match the original setup 7Sage provided? It's really illogical and inconvenient to the users testing for the November LSAT.
Users pay 7Sage for an easier LSAT study experience. The fact this was done without warning is incredibly inconsiderate to the CCv2 users still taking the next five test administrations.
@melissaindaa471 @mishal20a867 @brennavanstone40
Hi there,
The LG lessons in CC V1 and CC V2 are completely the same, the time to complete CC V1 is longer because of the pre-made Problem Sets in CC V1 which were removed in CC V2 because the Drill feature is better. You can just skip the Problem Sets in CC V1 and use Drills to practice the type of games you want to work on.
Let me know if you have any other questions.
I was almost done with the LG section on V2 and now I suddenly have hours of material left if I pick it up from the same point in V1. This completely messed up my planned schedule. Shouldn't we have been put to notice before removing LG from V2?
Just adding that is much easier for users planning to take the new LSAT to collapse or "checkmark complete" the LG section for the time being than it is for current users to have to completely switch versions and accommodate their study schedules.
I completely agree with this! I'm taking the November LSAT and this completely threw off my schedule :( plus the V2 logic games was more condensed and I don't have time to go through V1. Save me and please bring back V2 logic games. It's too early to make these adjustments
I agree with this! As someone who planned their timeline with the study schedule which used CCV2 logic games, my timeline is completely ruined with them removing the logic games section. For example, the streamlined version allowed me to complete logic games curriculum within a week and switching back to CCV1 it will take much longer. My suggestion would be at add it back with an option to remove if someone is planning to take the August LSAT.
@aiayala428 @aiayala428 @brennavanstone40 @marynuez206 @vidailano899
@kescoe26929
Hi All,
I'm so sorry for the trouble, and I truly appreciate your feedback and suggestions. We are committed to providing excellent service and continuously seeking areas for improvement, so I will certainly share your input with the rest of our team.
Please feel free to let us know if you have any other feedback or suggestions. We're all ears! Many thanks, everyone!
Agreed!
Without warning either!
totally agree with this!! its been super inconvenient imo
Bump on this! I need to be able to see games without moving back and forth it is really frustrating.
I agree with this, I felt that the second Version of the syllabus was much a more helpful / efficient way of approaching Logic Games. Please bring it back !!