Hey guys,

I'm writing to see if anyone else is having the same issue: when I go to drill, I noticed that I can't select a double-category question (e.g., doing 3-5 weaken/causal combo questions). I've tried it 2x now and I'll get causal questions, but then be given causal MSS, MC, and SA, not only causal weaken like I want.

If anyone encountered this issue, how did you resolve it?

Self explanatory. I used to be able to see how long I had an answer choice selected (orange = incorrect; green = correct).

I am no longer seeing that. It is just a blank/grey bar.

Often when I make practice drills I find that if I pick questions automatically, it seems like there is a tendency puts the most difficult 5 star questions first, and the easier 3 stars and 2 stars later. Maybe that's just me, but at the very least you can say there's no observable pattern as to how questions are ordered based on difficulty. This is really disorienting, as this is the opposite of what you're going to encounter on the tests, and generally it's just easier for me to work into the difficulty.

I'd like to propose that the automatic question generator can sort questions starting from easiest to hardest. The ordering doesn't have to be super precise, but I feel like this feature would both enable better performance and better simulate test conditions

I'd love a possibility for us to drill flagged Logical Reasoning questions. I usually flag questions I want to come back to because it either helps me understand a question type better or is good practice.

Thanks!

If so, please include drills, sections, and literally any other time we do a question (for ex, in the CC)

It would be really nice to have a feature that allows you to see the class recordings you have started but not finished. It would also be nice if it saved the spot where you left off in the recording

Is there a section in 7Sage Analytics that shows where I’ve improved over time?

Whenever I try to add live classes to my calendar on the new 7sage it redirects me to a download file for apple calendar. I am unfortunately not an apple user and have to use the classic 7sage to then add the classes to my calendar. Is there a method I'm missing or can we have this added?

Hey y'all. I'd love to see "Blind Review" questions show up here separately. Most of the gaps I'm spending looking over blind review questions and really digging in, but this graph makes it look like I'm doing nothing. Happy to do a user interview if more info is desired!

Hello, I have been a long time user of 7sage and the new website has been good to me but I have noticed a few issues as of recently.

1. When I am practicing in a drill, the highlighter used to be applicable across any question I switched between. But in the sets I have done today, I find myself having to click on the highlighter again whenever I move to another question.

2. When I come to the end of my drill after submitting, the review section is not keeping track of how much time I spent on any question other than the 1st one. When I click on these questions to review them, it tells me that I have to click to mark the questions as seen. This worries me a bit because I don't want to be practicing with the same questions I have done or seen before.

   

3. In blind review it used to only mark questions that the website though you should review, but for some reason every question is marked for blind review whenever I complete a drill now.

   

   Please let me know if there are any fixes to this, thank you!

Time-tracking on drills/sections for me is not consistent/available anymore. If a drill takes 7 minutes to complete and there's five questions, my tracker states that I spent 7 minutes on the first question and 0 minutes on the following four. Is time-tracking not working for anybody else? How can I fix this?

Really enjoying 7Sage and it's helping me study with its wonderful explanations. However, there are some bugs that I've experienced that prove to be difficult to manage.

1. When drilling like for every question the website randomly refreshes and goes back to the first question while I'm doing a further question (like 5-6). Sometimes doing this refresh back to back, multiple times per question.

2. In the "Study Plan" feature, whenever I complete a practice section as recommended (perhaps because I do them untimed) they are never marked off as complete.

3. When I finish a week for the "Study Plan" feature, and I manually collapse the week, it does not stay collapsed upon subsequent visits to the page and it's a pain to have to scroll all the way down to get to the portion of the study plan I need (especially because after every drill I'm redirected to the analytics page as opposed to back to there).

4. On a couple of occasions I've paused during a drill and the time for that question reads 0:00 when I submit, making it hard to gauge how long I spent on that question.

Despite these, really good job on the updates, they are really helpful in aiding me to determine my weaknesses for this test and adequately prepare. I really do like the study plan feature and the task list helps me stay focused on what I need to accomplish in a given week.

I would really love to be able to maybe:

1. Open drills in a new tab (from the study plan feature), so I don't have to navigate after completion

2. Quickly view -0 sections. When I do -0 on a section, under the analytics tab where it says LR Progress I can't see that section (to be able to quickly go to the results and review that section), since there is no bar.

3. Open the study plan section and it automatically scroll to the portion of the page I need (i.e. my next drill/section/pt)

When I'm browsing through the recorded classes and scrolling down, I sometimes click on something to take a closer look. But when I hit the back button, it takes me all the way back to the top of the list, which is really inconvenient. I wish the back button would return me to the exact spot I was viewing before, instead of resetting to the top

Hi 7Sage!

One thing I noticed is that if you accidentally skip the Blind Review while taking a PT, then there is no other option to retake using Blind Review. This makes studying really frustrating, and I think it would be really helpful to have the option to BR even if you know your PT score results. I hope this can be implemented soon!

Best,

Madison <3

I have really enjoyed this site, and my membership. The analytics are unmatched, the lessons are wonderful.

My only concern is that your website is so much easier on the eyes than the LSAC site is. I know how utterly ridiculous that sounds.

The first time I drilled on 7sage, I realized that my eyes did not face the same fatigue that they did on LSAC. I actually got concerned at how comfortable it was.

This is a longshot, but are there visual themes available that would be more similar to LSAC's site, so that I can practice more similarly to the way the test is going to be?

Maybe I am alone in the blue-light fatigue I experience on LSAC, but it doesn't seem to happen nearly as much here. It's been great in terms of allowing me to drill for longer without feeling exhausted, but I am concerned I am setting myself up for failure in a sense, by practicing on nicer equipment than I'll have for the test....Does this make any sense or am I just utterly looney tunes?

Just want to give KUDOS to the design team/administrators! Ya'll ask what we wanted, we told you, and you listened!! Thanks and great job!!

I love the highlighted bar that describes your accuracy on certain question tags relative to the 175+ scorer. It would be cool if there was another bar that also included timing. This could let me know if there are types of questions I spend much longer on without having to look looking at each individual question or drill set to see where I stand for timing.

I really like the new score goal setting for the analytics (thanks!), but having taken over 2,000 questions it's really hard to gauge how much I'm actually improving, since moving the percentages takes a ton questions. If there was a way to see how I've performed over the last 2 weeks (or any user defined amount of time) in my analytics, in combination with how that aims towards the goal score, I think that would give me a better idea of how i look at this moment, as opposed to including a bunch of data from when i was really bad at this stuff.

It would be so helpful if we were able to do the Blind Review but without marks from "taking too long to answer the questions." I would prefer if the Blind Review would just let us know to check which answers are incorrect.

You can import your LawHub PrepTests in your settings.

Should we auto-import your PrepTests by default? For example, we could periodically check if you have LawHub PrepTests and import them in the background, with a setting to opt out of this behavior.

To put the question another way, should LawHub import be opt-in (status quo) or opt-out?

Hi all at 7sage,

I know you all have said you're working on letting accommodated test takers (and anyone who desires it) remove the experimental/any section from analytics consideration, but I just wanted to throw my hat in the ring that this is urgent. My analytics are literally nearly unusable because they count my experimental which I do not do. I have the accommodation and cannot practice under my test conditions AND have accurate analytics at the same time. This makes 7sage's usefulness very low in terms of just the infrastructure of drilling, for me. I'm hoping this can be a top priority for myself and others with accommodations, but I know you have a lot on your plate, and am grateful for everything you're doing as well as for your continual improvements.

Thanks!

It's really sad that only LSATLab seems to have this option. I like the UI of 7sage better but this is forcing me to use another platform.

1. On this new website, I do not like how you cannot see the time stamp as the video is playing. Like you aren't able to skip forward and put where you want to watch, as the video is playing.

2. I wish you would have the total time it took you to drill when you are going over your answers.

The expected accuracy feature, which plays into analytics and priority tags, makes no sense. Say I have consistently scored 155-160 on all of my PTs, but my goal score is a 170, how am I supposed to reach that if it's giving me priorities based on other people in my current score range??? It could say that I have a "low priority' for a specific tag, just because I'm on level with people in my range, but if that range is lower than I am aiming for, it's not a low priority. This feature should be completely overhauled with the option to specifically choose a score range goal, and then it shows the accuracy needed to obtain that range.

If I am misunderstanding something, please help explain JY #feedback

It would be helpful if a feature could be added to pin specific drills taken to the top of the list for easy reference later.