LSAT
New post305 posts in the last 30 days
Hi All,
I was wondering if anyone had on advice of how to best practice logical reasoning with a mix of questions? I'm fine on accuracy and timing if I focus on a particular question type like on the drills, but I'm loosing accuracy once I take the timed practice tests. Is there a good method anyone has figured out to practice the mixed questions that minimizes taking out sections from the practice tests? (I don't want to use too many sections LR of the practice tests, since I want to save them for use as practice tests).
Thanks,
Michelle
Does anyone know how people can get few (like 1 or 2) to zero wrong on RC. I find it ridiculously hard sometimes to attain the necessary information within 8-9 minutes and to answer the questions for each passage.
Are those people just going back and forth between the Q and passage really really fast?
Could someone please help me to find where in the course I can find how to deal with "logically complete question stem". I am working on PT 59 S2 Q24 and I think I misinterpreted what was required. Are these questions MBT or MC?
Ok..I feel there is just no way I could have got this question. It is a most strengthen question and I feel the answer choice weakens the argument. The job is to sure up the fact that a volcanic event is the probable cause rather than meteorites. The part of B that says 'no known natural cause would likely account ...' I was thinking isn't meteorite as well as volcanoes natural causes so I immediately eliminated it. What do you guys think about this question?
http://classic.7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-58-section-4-question-23/
Pure sequencing game. Rule was something like W is before S OR S if before T BUT NOT BOTH... I was drawing a blank for a while. Doesn't that mean, in a nutshell, S will never be b/w W & T either before both or after both? Also, how do you draw that into your grand scheme efficiently? This game should have taken 6m, but drained 12 due to me not handling those 2 "or/not both" rules well.
First sentence I diagrammed as: wind & below 84-> pleasant. The second part of this question I diagrammed as : above 84 or no wind ->oppressive. I incorrectly got answer choice (B) it has something to do the the humidity but I was able to add it to my diagramming. Help please.
I do not understand the difference between answer choice C and D. How do you suggest that I decipher between two choices that are so close. I tried to incorporate them into the passage and incorrectly thought that D was a winner.
This question is very difficult because I just cannnot understand the stimulus. Could I please get an explanation of this question stem and answer choices?
Hi, I come across this problem in argument part questions: is a hypothesis the same thing as a statement?
I usually eliminate the wrong answer choices by matching them up to the stimulus (Ex. I eliminate the answer choice starts with "it is a premise " because I id'ed the statement as a conclusion). But some argument part questions describes statements differently (A) "This is a statement" or B) "this is a hypothesis for which the author supports." Should we eliminate answer choices that call it a hypothesis when it is a statement? Is there even a difference.
Ex: Is a "Fetuses develop fingernails in the third week of development" a statement?
Is " Scientists say fetuses develop fingernails in the third week" a hypothesis?
I've noticed that in some LR questions, there would be sentences that start off like "Even though","although". These sentences are qualifying the the argument a bit more correct? I remember in one particular video something about this, I think it was acknowledging something so as to prevent the reader from using it against the argument or something like that...
What are your opinions on this?
Hello there. Question on point of issue questions - which is better? doing the list method or reading through and determining the disagreement/agreement?
Fumbling between methods made me lose time on my recent PTs. I either start list method and then find the POI is easy to see and lose time or try reading and have to do list method because POI is not too clear cut.
Advice appreciated. Thanks 7sagers!
I took the LSAT earlier this year and scored in the low-170s. Concerned about the September LSAT due to how I felt on the test and a variety of personal factors. Should I purchase score preview so I can cancel?
7Sage:
Some recent additions to 7Sage are great, like the games and AI. But I would love to know why you felt the need to change the interface. The previous interface was a lot more straight forward. Now I spend several minutes trying to figure out which combination of the following buttons I need to have to cross out an answer or highlight it yellow. This was not necessary. Please don't change things just for the sake of changing things. 
I honestly wouldn't recommend this course, I began with an 145, I am about to take a prep test and I know for a fact that the instructors have confused me more than help me, just tell me why and which answer is correct not make me think why the other answers might be correct is annoying, I hightly regret taking this course
I'm still kinda on the sidelines about the enitre "going to law school" thing, and I just took my first full PrepTest with no practice/knowledge about the LSAT. I got a score of 163, and I was wondering if it would be worth for me to spend my time and energy on studying for the LSAT... I don't really want to take the exam multiple times, and I would preferably take the June 2026 exam.
Would it be unreasonable for me to shoot for a mid-170s for the June 2026 exam based on what I have right now?
I know that 176 is a great score, however before the test in June I had got 3/4 180s on PTs. I am a splitter for the T-14s (3.6 gpa, math major). I graduated back in 2021, so I think I count as non-traditional. I looked on the admissions predictor and a 180 vs a 176 could raise my chances by 10-20% at top schools. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
dont want to spend time to, yet, I cant move on in my study plann easily without such a "comment"
Listen and subscribe:
With about a month remaining until the June LSAT, you might be wondering about your progress and what your next steps should be. In this episode, hosts Nicole, Bailey, and Henry explore how to effectively evaluate where you stand in your preparation as test day approaches. They'll discuss helpful ways to understand your current performance, identify areas that could benefit from more focus, and develop a practical plan to guide your studies through these final important weeks. Join them for a supportive look at navigating the last month of your LSAT journey.
Listen and subscribe:
Are you finding your LSAT review process isn't yielding the results you want? Bailey, Nicole, and ZeSean discuss why simply checking answers isn't sufficient and introduce better approcahes approach to review. They detail essential techniques, including effective error analysis strategies and mastering the Blind Review method, explaining how these transform review from a passive chore into an active, powerful tool for boosting your score.
Listen and subscribe:
This episode from the 7Sage LSAT podcast aims to help you conquer Flaw questions, discussing common mistakes in arguments and how to identify them. We then explore how these specific analytical skills are useful beyond just Flaw questions, making a real difference in how you tackle other LSAT question types. You'll also get to see this in action as we work through a few example questions as a practical exercise.
Listen and subscribe:
Unlock the secret to acing both Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension! Many test-takers treat these as separate challenges, but the truth is, they're deeply connected. On this episode, we explore why the biggest hurdle in LR often isn't the logic itself, but actually understanding what you read. Plus, we'll show you how to see RC passages as extended LR questions. Ready to transform your approach? Listen in!
I’m currently studying inference and must-be-true questions, but I’m encountering a problem that’s making me spend more time on questions than I should. I’m getting the questions right most of the time, but I feel like I confuse myself when I try to diagram the internal lawgic of the stimulus. Has anyone else encountered this issue while studying?
Hi everyone! I took the LSAT in February and got a 171. My goal was a 174, which is above the medians at the schools I want to apply to, but I was still happy. I was going to take it again in April but my scores went down so I ghosted the test. I haven't studied since. In my practice tests, my average was 172, but I realized that each test I got 7-8 questions wrong, and sometimes I was lucky and that was a 175 or I was unlucky and it was below 170. Does that mean I never really improved? How do I get to a place of consistently scoring less than 7-8 questions wrong per test? Or have I reached my limit? How did people break out of a score they were stuck at? Especially when there is no pattern in the questions I am getting wrong. Thanks! Hope everyone is doing well!
I took a diagnostic a few weeks ago but haven’t taken any full PTs since then. Right now, I’m only partially through the curriculum, I’ve made some progress in the Logical Reasoning section but haven’t touched Reading Comp yet.
I’m tempted to start taking full-length practice tests to begin building endurance and test-day skills, but I’m also worried it might be too early. I don’t want to waste time on PTs if I’d be better off continuing through the lessons first.
When should I start taking full PTs?
On the original site, when I didn't like my performance on a certain drill or when I'd like to drill the same drill again, I would duplicate it. But this duplicating feature doesn't seem to show up in the new site. Will it contain this