i thought the conception of fiction affected her literary art, not the other way around. Isn't that the whole point of the passage: Jewett's novel was different because they had different conceptions of the purpose of fiction, so do not compare them as synonymously.
@SMRegalado Its casting doubt. it doesnt say its not essential it just says that certain medical therapies that dont use it can be effective. Maybe those medical therapies use something else to supplement the diets like a pill or something. Idk thats just what im thinking.
didnt know what conspicuously meant. damn i hate when that happens. I thought it meant like covertly lol
This seems quite unusual for LSAC to change the exam UI so much. It seems that they are intentionally making the exam harder. First the lsat test interface changed and the text became smaller, then the mask feature was made more difficult, then the highlighting feature was changed, and now this.
@Synigoros Same exact thing. That is one thing about this test that I just dont understand. Why make the answer choices so hard on subjects that we typically have a surface level understanding. Afterall, this is an entry test for law school...
@Kevin_Lin I think maybe that is aside the point. Maybe all of them should be entertained if it was selected. Thanks for your video.
@lsat=psychologicalwarfare
love the name. but also i agree. Like i understand that J.Y got a 180, but not all of us are as logically inclined.
lol i thought impetus meant to impede. if they had used ANY other word i would have picked C.
this is a strange argument. I hate when the lsat makes such absurd stimulus's
I picked E because I thought the assumption that we needed both to be physically run down and need something other than strep was unwarranted.
I think i thought that because I didnt do the contrapositive of the conclusion which. when done, then gives two necessary conditions for being infected.
P1: if infected--> physically run down
C: /evidence other than Strep.B-->/conclude infection ( conclude infection--> evidence other than Strep.B.
If i did this right, then thats how we get two necessary conditions. That made this question more clear for me.
I dont really understand BR exactly. What I do is when i get a question wrong I review it. Is that blind review? Or is it when you re-do the entire section again? And then after that you then review missed questions? That seems overly redundant and very time consuming. Also for the setting in BR it shows what questions you missed. Should I turn this setting off so I dont know which ones are wrong?
I always give the language of the Answer choices the benefit of the doubt, need to be more critical of weird wording like in E.
i must say that the definition of merit as a pro and con was not at all how I understood it to mean. That was surprisingly helpful because I had a hard time differentiating between C and D
Heres how I understand A to be wrong even though I picked it:
A wrong because the premises jump from people in the past to people today. The jump and the continuity in B is the assumption that the argument requires. If its not easier for people today than it was thousands of years ago to domesticate then it explains why the conclusion is that undomesitcated animals are either difficult or not worth it.
A sounds really good and is super helpful for the argument but if it werent true it wouldnt change anything the argument is saying
@NoahRomero I hate this test with every single cell in my body. to me this test doesnt equate to law school success.