The reason I picked C was because I think it is the only answer that offers a "false opposition" like the one in the passage.

the written explanation of C has confused me that maybe I did not pick this answer for the right reasons....

So if C said "supports one of Malthus's positions" would it be correct?

@LevinKin7sageLSATDESTROYER I agree, - it feels more like NA then flaw

is it possible that A is actually anti-supported by the argument? If it is impossible to understand uninterrupted streams of sounds, then that would make the non-natives perception impossible since native speakers do understand their own language

Did anyone else misunderstand the last sentence and think it meant that it would be better to be ruled by the few?

I do not understand why he chose to set up the first sentence as exist -> (less int -> /determ)

instead of

exist -> (determ -> as int)

I feel like me translating the lawgic in this way set me up for lots of confusion in this question

Advice? thx :)

is it true that for most NA questions, we do not want a conditional statement to be our answer?

misunderstood the conclusion... I thought "warning" was referring to a new idea that if doctors were going to intentinally decieve paitents, the must include a warning before they do so...

I'm just going to take an L on this one....

If I did this passage by myself, I would definitly take it more as a critique/debate passage. I feel like the MP follows as the author's view the ideas are the important part

the phrase "misuderstanding of this fact" really got me on this one

I just did a useful thought exersice and wrote out my own example for each method of reasoning listed - would recommend!

#feedback - I got the Librarian question in my drill that was from the you try right before

Is there a way to Blind Review the you try questions? I feel like I press submit and the result immediately pops up

so the first two sentences are not a phenomenon?