Agamemnon got that dog in him

Sigerson couldn't say no to my bribes to build 3 new Child Rat Casinos in the city

Love you

Come on down the the neighborhood child casino owned by your favorite rat!

"How the hell do you pronounce this?"

JY: Proceeds to pronounce Plesiosauromorphs perfectly

Agreed Dr. Keedic

Awesome, thank you!!

#feedback this takes way longer than 3 minutes to read and digest. I know it's not a huge deal, but I think it's important to provide accurate time predictions for sections. I've noticed this is a common theme for most reading lessons, that the time it takes to complete is underestimated.

I'm going to get 0/5 on the SA drill forsure

OH HE NEEED SOME MILK

JY forgot about the 3rd version of people who get this question correct, like me: those who guess

how is this a level 3 difficulty question

I run the pizza game in this town

In this section, you're negating the clause and making it the necessary, not sufficient condition.

You were sent to destroy the LSAC not join them!

We have no interest in preserving the LSAT writers

That feeling when JY gets to your answer choice and goes, "Oooookaayyy"

DMT for the children!

So back LSATbeast LFG!

JY flexin that 7sage salary ;)

I was between E & C when working through the question. E stuck out to me because it provided direct proof that the conclusion of the stimulus was wrong. The overall argument of the stimulus is that this meteor did not cause a mass extinction event of dinosaurs. The argument is based on a premise that this meteor could not have had a global impact. Assuming E is true, it provides evidence against the argument by saying the meteor did not need to have a global impact since most of the dinosaurs on the planet lived in the immediate area of meteor's impact.

Hope this helps!

JY I just wanna say I love you. You make studying for the LSAT much more tolerable.

#feedback I don't find it helpful when the explanations talk about what the answer choices could have said to make them a good answer choice. The over analysis often leaves me confused and I feel it's information that's irrelevant to the question at hand. Additionally, it makes the explanations way too in depth with excess information.

how could you have done this, God?!

rekt