With how it's looking with this you try and the previous one, it looks like this might be my skip section due to timing :') BUT I will still aim to get faster

At first, I put D because I was just lost in the answer choices and gave up immediately but --after breaking down the referential words and applying it to the stimulus during the blind review I was able to find the correct answer.

That's part of the reason why I stopped studying based on the estimated times and more on how many modules I want to get done that day.

I got the answer right I was just so thrown off by the strength of the analogy lol

I would suggest working on grammar lessons from the foundations section. It really helps when you're able to distinguish a premise from a conclusion.

Really helpful sections. I think I'm going to start writing down the question stems for every question type and make a guide like this.

I had to reread the question 7 times before finally understanding it :')

I had the same issue but then I realized that I was confusing increased profits as the necessary condition to decrease in traffic. The only way for increased profits to be hinged on both decreased traffic and decreased cost of living is if decreased traffic and decreased cost of living were the sufficient conditions in a conjunctive 'and' statement.

I used translation to help me out on this one. For some reason the word "recreation" was throwing me off so I just translated it from "recreation" to "spending money on bs" lol

I usually skip the video if I'm able to not only get the question right but also explain why the other answers are wrong with 100% confidence.

If I could fist fight a question it would be this one

I've noticed that the answer choices are also set up to make you think coffee house and restaurant are interchangeable with public place... or at least that's how it got me lol

I think it was thrown in as a way to test us and see if what we're learning is being solidified in our brains or not.

#feedback Shouldn't the conditional indicator for question 2 be "without"?

No, I'm pretty sure they put that in to trick us. On the LSAT there are many instances where questions will attempt to trick/distract the reader with background information. I'm guessing 7sage put this in to make sure we actually know when a passage is an argument and when it isn't.

The Disney argument is the strongest because its argument is both true and logically sound. The tiger argument is true but there is no direct support. The Trash can argument seems to rely heavily on speculation.