needed to see this today. thanks!

i'd love to know the answers this as well, so tag me back here when someone responds lol

@emmaningjiuan280 agreed on your video analysis. "so what" is not an explanation lol. I think that explaining why the answer choice might be attractive to some, then explaining how that line of reasoning is misguided would be way more helpful then blanket statements like "it's just wrong," "its unhelpful for the argument," or "this doesn't do anything." Clearly, some people thought it did.

#feedback

@Kevin_Lin I did see your video and it was very helpful, thank you! This was more a comment for JYs video. I've noticed this trend across the board with JY's videos (I love you JY don't get me wrong), and unfortunately you (Kevin) don't have a vid on each question to give further detail. Sometimes I just can't see why an AC is wrong, and after going through all the discussion comments it's still not clear. I struggle with SA/NA and do some mental gymnastics to make an AC work sometimes, so it's helpful to have the logic broken down in real time.

I'm sorry but there is no chance in hell this is a level three passage am I just losing it or something

in what world is this a level 2 passage LOL

@JacobBaska Thank you Jacob!

this is a TERRIBLE answer choice. nowhere in the passage was there an indication that this was the primary focus of circulum. it specificalluy says "a vital aspect of the practice of law" and "Much of legal education, with its focus on judicial decisions and analysis of cases." we've learned time and time again that it has to explicitly say something is the primary reason/thing, or else its just one thing, or even a big thing, but not exactly the MAIN thing. how is this different????

why are there so few comments on here #trippy

#help is the "ask a tutor" button disabled?

why is it sometimes ok to have "if/then" answer choices be correct but others are not? I've heard reasoning for an AC to be incorrect simply based on the fact that theres and "if/then" in the AC.

i think its really unhelpful to say "these answers are wrong just because they aren't ____" : (

guys be so fr with me rn how am i supposed to get this in 1:10

but doesn't production cost influence retail prices?

How come a lot of answer choices are disregarded because we don't know anything about the negated idea, but in this case we can make assumptions on the negated idea? for example, my thought process was that the stimulus is talking about someone competent, so we dont really know about the group of incompetent people.

I dont understand why C is right. It isn't technically the only reason. The stim mentions 1. its a sacred right and 2. people have always been able to vote by mail. I would consider the fact that its a sacred right to be a second reason that doesn't fall under the "tradition" umbrella

in what world would i get this under 1:10

this makes literally zero sense, how does this relate to the scientist's interests at all? maybe it could be the reason, but there is nothing in the passage to indicate that.

i still do not understand what AC A is saying

Hi Alex! I'm interested if there are still openings.

@MarcusTsang I also thought about the speed v. acceleration discrepancy, but the stimulus conflates wealth with income which is a similar comparison - you can have $5 billion in income but still be poor because you spend all your money on pay day. Don't know if that's what they're going for but this is how I thought about it!

Why wouldn't the "if" claim in E be a problem? I understand the similarities in logic but I'm confused because normally we would knock a parallel/analogy question if the stimulus wasn't a conditional, yet the AC was.