Lock Mr.Fat Cat up

Original: Most vegans who are mute are kind 

Negated: It's not the case that most vegans who are mute are kind 

Translated: 0-50% of vegans who are mute are kind 

so for example some vegans are kind

Negated: No vegans are kind

we are denying the intersection of the relationship in its entirety. Because few= at least 1 we must go with the definitive no claim to establish that no vegans are in fact kind

yeah so we only know that the assassination attempt failed. But failing it doesn't trigger the sufficient condition. Just means IF she gave her speech it failed. No connection to it passing

A bear does indeed shit in the woods

Sweet goodness I came back after finishing this section to review and I just barely got it. I only eliminated E because i reread the stim and saw it wasn't a direct experiment. it was about the subjects and not the beta carotene.

Less smoking-> more beta carotene> less cancer risk. So maybe they were just healthier people.

This question made my balls ache...I got this question right without really understanding what the premise was saying( I hate science topics), so here was my train of thought.

Summary of Stim

-2 molecules in weed killer brand(both mirror images)

-one kills weeds, the other does fuck all

-effectiveness dependent on local soil conditions cuz of molecule concentration in the soil? (what does that even mean), different soil different reaction?

Conc: Data of effects is BS

Thought process behind picking an answer

A) Just repeats second point, bye bye

B) Equally concentrated? Equally likely? But its effectiveness is soil dependent? They ignored the truth of the prem! Gotcha!

C)Has nothing to do with data, pce

D)Literally weakens Conc that the data is BS, go away

E) Literally a word salad, sounds good but doesn't fit into the premise. Its attractive because it states that the Data is BS, but its also wrong because thats the only thing its doing.

damn, i got the answer wrong during blind review..i suck

Dang it took me 5 minutes to be comfortable with B. I knew it was right but when placed against E it was a challenge. The only reason I didn't pick E was because of the word believe.

E is wrong because just because someone believes themselves to be X doesn't mean that belief is valid.

I don't understand this. How can you not have a copy of the script if you are an actor who played a role in Hamlet? How did you memorize your lines?!!!! How would you know the lines of your other co actors if you didn't have a copy of the script?

Isnt only a Group 2 Necessary condition indicator? Why is the contract being put in the sufficient condition?

sweet jesus got this right but it took me 4 minutes. I kept getting lost in the stimulus and trying to figure out the logic of the bad answers and forgetting what I was trying to prove ( engraving>/engraving)

A) All tools used for engraving are etching tools as well

Doesnt matter and I already assumed this.

B) There are as many pin-tipped etching tools as there are bladed etching tools.

guarantees the conc. If there are 100 bladed and 100 pin tip, then 100 engraving from pintip and even if just 1 bladed is for engraving then the conclusion follows. 101 engraving 99 /engraving.