User Avatar
KSki
Joined
Jun 2025
Subscription
Core

Admissions profile

LSAT
157
CAS GPA
Not provided
1L START YEAR
2027

Applications

Maine
Waitlisted
Oregon
Waitlisted

Discussions

LSAT · August LSAT - New Tester Interface on 7Sage
User Avatar
KSki
4 days ago

The new interface is actually less efficient. The "block out" tool is now tedious, forcing me to click back and forth, wasting 15-30 seconds per question. Furthermore, removing the ability to highlight text within answer choices is a huge downgrade for analyzing flagged questions. I hope they don't push through the aforementioned changes.

They should just keep the ability to highlight answer choices + have the eye toggle to "block out" wrong answers.

37
User Avatar
•

4 days ago

KSki

😖 Frustrated

New Lawhub interface (aug 2026)

Is anyone else concerned/frustrated with the new law hub interface? I just took my first practice section in the new interface... I have my concerns.

First, why did they make it extremely inconvenient to "block out" wrong answers? It took me on average 15-30 more seconds per question, simply because I had to keep clicking back and forth to be able to "block out" wrong answers, and go back to being able to choose the right answer.

To try and combat this I was going to highlight why I chose the wrong answer (as I normally do in the practice), and now that's not an option either. Which brings me to my second issue... why can we not highlight in the answer choice anymore? this was extremely useful for going back to flagged questions, as I would highlight certain words in the 2 AC's I was stuck between.

The test is already difficult in its self, I feel like they should have just kept the eye symbol to "block out" wrong answers. this new feature definitely does not make my experience "smoother and easier", it makes it more time consuming.

I think the fact it has more accessibility regarding color filters, font, etc. is awesome, but the aforementioned changes are burdensome and borderline unnecessary.

7
PrepTests ·
PT113.S2.Q20
User Avatar
KSki
Edited Saturday, Apr 25

this question is difficult. How are we supposed to realistically conclude that horses and seals are similar enough for option A to potentially strengthen the argument, when seals and horses have VAST genetic differences. yes, they are both in the class "mammalia", but the genus, families, and even order of species typing are so drastically different. For me, when reading B I thought, "oh other seal species are much more similar (than horses and seals) and if other seals can store oxygen in other places of the body, it could help the argument, because based on this why couldn't it also be stored in the spleen? Who's to say that antarctic seals don't dive even deeper for longer than other seals and need even more "over flow space"?" .... How do we determine when an analogy is analogous enough even if it is blatantly dissimilar?

2
General · How do you want to customize the study scheduler?
User Avatar
KSki
Friday, Apr 24

It would be helpful to be able to toggle "new and incorrect ever", or "incorrect ever + incorrect more than once" at the same time when choosing what questions to do for drills/sections. Currently I can only toggle 1 at a time

0
PrepTests ·
PT138.S3.Q12
User Avatar
KSki
Thursday, Dec 18, 2025

When I initially went through this problem, I removed B because it only dealt with tastiness and not with healthfulness as well. Because it is a PSA question, is that why it is okay to not have healthfulness in the answer as well? In other words, in PSA, as long as it has one factor being strengthened, it could be the correct answer?

3
Lessons · Character and Fitness Addenda Overview
User Avatar
KSki
Tuesday, Dec 16, 2025

in my addendum, can I say "as noted in my personal statement" if it alludes to the challenge I discuss there?

1
PrepTests ·
PT116.S3.Q25
User Avatar
KSki
Friday, Dec 12, 2025

why is it not a most arrow between wealth and harm (wealth -m-> harm)? "Often" indicates "not all the time", so how do we determine it is in fact an all arrow?

1
PrepTests ·
PT138.S2.Q13
User Avatar
KSki
Friday, Dec 12, 2025

When I first went through the question I did not put it together that the rebate program would help gamers to not only purchase the game for cheaper, but that it would make it more cost effective to purchase the game if the want to complete it. If we imagine it takes 2 weeks to complete, roughly 14 days, and the game cost is 80$, but renting is 40$. It is more cost efficient to purchase the game, instead of the 280$ (roughly) to rent the game long enough to complete it. Once looking at the problem this way it clicked very fast, and made me feel rather silly for messing it up the first time around.

1
Lessons · Fast Track - Main Conclusion
User Avatar
KSki
Saturday, Nov 1, 2025

I really appreciate the addition of these videos into the core curriculum.

19
Lessons · Confusing Sufficiency for Necessity
User Avatar
KSki
Tuesday, Jul 15, 2025

What is a necessary condition?

What is a Sufficient condition?

1
Lessons · Skill Builder - Negation 2
User Avatar
KSki
Monday, Jul 14, 2025

For "If A then B" statements: can we essentially treat these the same as negating "Most A are B" statements?

0

Confirm action

Are you sure?