- Joined
- Jun 2025
- Subscription
- Core
Admissions profile
Discussions
Thought I would share something silly I did too! (I forgot the head things on the big one but its fine lol)
relax: I try to give myself a few 5 - 10 minute breaks when I feel myself getting distracted + the LSAT games is a nice little "break tool" to use. Resting is always something I have struggled with so I also have been giving myself an hour before bed where I just do self care, drink some tea (usually YOGI - stress relief) and listen to those lofi music videos to decompress. mindset: if you feel yourself getting burnout it is 100% okay to take a day of no studying. Again, something I struggled with my entire life, but it does wonders for your mental health. I would take at least a weekend off if you are feeling super burnt out. Most importantly, do not allow your score to dictate your self worth (something I also struggle with). I wish you the best! (something I really recommend is to delete any and all social media you have for at least a month, its life changing and I haven't had it for a year + (I've never felt more confident and better)
I struggled with C because the tone of the author doesn't seem to support "well-meaning". I thought based on the passage the author thought the ideas were lacking: girls unlike boys leave school at 8 +continued to define women in terms of roles in domestic sphere + neither proposal envision fully equal for women...
@KatrinaFurman they do a staggered system. Hopefully yours opens soon! everyone should be able to do it at some point today
@superchillasian Ah, they do a staggered system. Hopefully yours opens soon! everyone should be able to do it at some point today
I at first got rid of D on my first pass through because I thought they implied that they are not nocturnal by stating "... are not known to forage at night" which made me assume that they were not nocturnal birds. On reviewing this question D is slapping my face because it makes more sense than C which I initially picked (yet felt not great about). I guess the lesson for me here is to be much more picky about the wording and not just assume a quality (in this case: not being nocturnal)
@superchillasian @mkuranty they should have sent an email to you/ if you log into your LSAC account it should pop up. I was able to already schedule mine... Although I did get in right at 11 and was still 50th in cue, could be they just have too many people in the cue?
One more question: are they going to leave the font as the off-black color, or will they have it be straight black, because I feel like that makes the readability inadequate too.
to everyone on this thread who validated my frustration + helped me figure out how to change the font, you are much appreciated.
@potato7739 Is this something we will have the capability to change on test day? Do you know if we will be able to do it prior to starting our test, or will it be another thing that will take away our precious time?
@Fizzypop It's wild to me because the font size would be wholly unacceptable in universities and colleges, as well as court documents, etc. so how is it acceptable for them to put it on the LSAT? If you wrote a summons and complaint at 10.5 pt font and filed it I am almost positive the court would send it back and make you fix the font.
@KSki Just checked the font size by pasting an excerpt in Word and it is at 10.5. (Which is discouraged at many colleges (at all levels) for essays where they believe it is better to have 12 pt font, at the very least 11 pt as it is difficult to read otherwise ; and there are often penalties to your grade if the font is lower due to the hinderance of readability)
@zgainez The text is much smaller now when doing practice drills. It's about half the size it was. I'm not sure if we have to have a medical excuse to get larger text on the actual test (and if we do 2 weeks is really not feasible), but for someone with glasses, this does nothing to determine my understanding of the test, just makes it more difficult to take for no reason. If you take a practice drill it should reflect what I'm saying
Feeling very discouraged, defeated, and frustrated as LSAC changed the look of the interface AGAIN... 2 weeks before test day! Why is the text so incredibly tiny now?
I honestly feel like August test takers should be able to reschedule to September for FREE, and we should be able to sue them (to bad they force us to sign that we won't sue for us to even be able to take the test).
I know I am not alone in this frustration but changing it again two weeks before the August test days is actually mental. I feel like everytme I finally get used to a change they just pile more on. On top of that I was finally starting to score closer to my goal, and I feel the interface changes really screwed up my timing and momentum.
I wish everyone else luck on the August LSAT.
it's frustrating they keep making the changes when the August test is 3 weeks away. At this point they are just doing this to make the test more tedious and time consuming.
@Bagle Thank you.... there are various factors that impacted it, should I try to focus on 1-2, or should I try and give an overview of that point in my life?
My Bachelors undergrad GPA is a 3.81, with my final semester being a 4.0, but my cumulative is much lower because when I first started college (to get my associates degree) it was at the outbreak of COVID + my living situation was not the best and my grades suffered. Should I be worried about this as it was now 6 years ago and since then I have been constantly getting presidential's list, etc.? Is this something I should write an addendum for? I feel since I have consistently gotten dean's and presidential lists since, then those alone show that I am a good student, but is it still important to write an addendum to explain the difficult situation I was in? SHOULD I RETAKE SOME OF THE COURSES I HAVE LOWER GRADES IN FROM 6 YEARS AGO?
I have been noticing that for purpose in context questions, the new interface does not highlight the key terms/sentences being referred to, which again is less efficient and more time consuming than the old interface. Has anyone heard if they will be adding this feature back in?
The new interface is actually less efficient. The "block out" tool is now tedious, forcing me to click back and forth, wasting 15-30 seconds per question. Furthermore, removing the ability to highlight text within answer choices is a huge downgrade for analyzing flagged questions. I hope they don't push through the aforementioned changes.
They should just keep the ability to highlight answer choices + have the eye toggle to "block out" wrong answers.
Is anyone else concerned/frustrated with the new law hub interface? I just took my first practice section in the new interface... I have my concerns.
First, why did they make it extremely inconvenient to "block out" wrong answers? It took me on average 15-30 more seconds per question, simply because I had to keep clicking back and forth to be able to "block out" wrong answers, and go back to being able to choose the right answer.
To try and combat this I was going to highlight why I chose the wrong answer (as I normally do in the practice), and now that's not an option either. Which brings me to my second issue... why can we not highlight in the answer choice anymore? this was extremely useful for going back to flagged questions, as I would highlight certain words in the 2 AC's I was stuck between.
The test is already difficult in its self, I feel like they should have just kept the eye symbol to "block out" wrong answers. this new feature definitely does not make my experience "smoother and easier", it makes it more time consuming.
I think the fact it has more accessibility regarding color filters, font, etc. is awesome, but the aforementioned changes are burdensome and borderline unnecessary.


