@MJ No seriously, i thuoght number 2 was valid because i mean... if this were a convo with someone it'd be safe to ASSUME shorty would be giving her speech, but this is not a regular convo with assumption based conclusions lol

I answered wrong the first time then once i did blind review i got it correct, I had to think about "hmm am i switching necessity and sufficient up? and once i thought that that MAY be a possibliblity, I looked back at what I wrote, which idea was on whihc side, adn realized E is the only one that matches the conclusion I drew, with the the sides matching the "if, then" statemnt in answer choice E. Also, my bad for mispelled words, my grammarly is off

@Arkavian i think in the conditional and set logic folder, GROUP 1 AND GROUP 2 are specifically for the indicator words "only" and "the only"

YO I GOT ALL BUT 5 CORRECT BUT ME AND 5 WERE LOOKING AT EACH OTHER LIKE "I KNOW YOU KNOW ME BUT GONE HEAD FIGURE IT OUT", I still got her wrong but 4/5 is better than my last attempt only getting 2 right hello

aye i got 1 and 5 right, i think ill be okay once i watch a few more videos omfg

So awkward because I chose B but was side eyeing the hell out of C, chose B, spirit felt wrong, knew it was C immediately omg guys pls

2/5, wacthed the discussions to 1-3 and im like "okay fine... i understand why i got it wrong", maybe next time! we got this

At some point will we learn how to do the writings he is doing? Like will we learn to write x=y -> a=b x=/b

Is this somethong you guys are wrinting down for notes?

@JashanpreetMalhi Hurricanes” isn’t the subject noun because the sentence is not making a claim directly about hurricanes themselves. The sentence is making a claim about the formation of hurricanes.

So the core sentence is:

‘The formation is triggered.’

Everything else just gives more information about the formation.

Also, “that threaten the United States mainland” is modifying hurricanes, not functioning as the main predicate. It’s describing which hurricanes we’re talking about.

So:

• subject noun = formation

• predicate verb = is triggered

The rest are modifiers giving more details :)) hope it helps, i didnt understand it last year so... progress will be made sooner for you!

1/5 then blind review hot 3/5, not sure whats going on but... yay?

YOURE TELLING ME I GOT THEM ALL RIGHT THE FIRST TIME AND THEN ALL WRONG DURING BLIND REVIEW WHAT THE HECK HAHHA

at first i chose e. felt it was right, did anonymous review and chose d, knew d was wrong becasue of the word "only", but i thought e was right because it seemed like it supported the claim that "so there is reason to believe that there may be life on Europa.", and that the subconclusion was "The presence of such a sea is thought by scientists to be a primary factor in the early development of life, ", but after submitting it and knowing i got both blind review and regular wrong, i tried again without looking at the right asner and retook it, i chose A, which is correct, becasue after a little more time to read, i was trying to be a speed demon and do POE quickly, but i need to take my time. Anyway, I chose A because after carefully re-reading, A is its own claim, own conclusion, that also supports the last sentence, which is the conclusion, and the in-between sentence serves as some sort of support, so.. yeah

It's difficult putting all we learned so far into practice lol. I got 1 and 2 wrong so far, by simply forgetting "for, since, and because", on top of finding the context... I got this though!

3/5 correct! Which is great becasue a year ago i was getting 0//0 :) I think on number one I paid too much attention to like...match subject matter rather than conclusion type, support type, logical flow. I also got 5 wrong at first, then during br got it correct, which... im proud of still.

@TiaTameraX2 SAME!! but its like... once u go back after getting it wrong isnt it crazy how D makes sense... like omg