love to get the right answer, but it's daunting to imagine cutting my time down by 75%.....

do you ever watch a lesson video and then realize you were zoned out the whole time and then have to watch it over again.....

just to check- you cannot draw a valid conclusion from this argument, right?

A‑m→B←s→C

What lesson did we learn about ←s→ relationships between two necessary claims deriving from the same sufficient? I just clicked through a bunch of the curric but cannot find it.

can -m-> mean most or just many?

OMG I was kind of freaked out with #2 because my answer (S->/A->/R -> B and J) did not match the written answer, but then it did match the video! WHEW

Wondering if anyone can help me with #4

Only Italian plumbers can fly while wearing raccoon suits.

Indicator: Only

subject: Italian plumbers

Raccoon Suit -> Fly

/fly -> /Raccoon suit

Did I mess the grammar up here or is this a sentence that can be interpreted in multiple ways? I broke It down more like Q1

What helped me choose C over B was that it sounded more like a rule

Before I even start this question, I want to acknowledge the drill title: "You Try - Intentionally Harming a Child"

ugh I have to remember that words like "completely" are carefully chosen by the LSAT writers, not like how I throw them around in real life...

This would have been a SKIP for me on a real LSAT

I literally just wrote this in my notes from the last question, yet I still picked E...

"Beware! Wrong answers often have X Believes _ . This does not mean what they believe is true, just that X believes it..."

C is double baddd