- Joined
- May 2026
- Subscription
- Live
Admissions profile
Discussions
i actually ate this tho; on sum easy light shit. whos fucking wit me? not even brian steel. on da gang!
helpful note: The principle needs the risk itself to be voluntarily accepted, not just the decision that leads to it.
why tf ya giving straight death sentences? maybe a level 2-3 to start?
sorry everyone else but I AM GOATED im fucking NA like its my bitch!
Fucked. I totally translated this initially as "We have a group of fully qualified candidates and when none of them currently work at Arvue. --> Arvue should go outside the group and find someone who is productive" - which only confused me futher lol
B shows how copyright would be un-useful (or equal)
E shows how copyright goes BEYOND its use
Guys, honestly, I don't even know what I'm doing to get these right 😭, but the biggest thing is don't overthink them.
For weaken questions, imagine you're listening to an everyday debate. The stimulus is one person talking, and the answer choices are people trying to clap back. The correct answer is the one that lands the best jab against the argument.
For strengthen questions, treat the stimulus like it's your friend and you're trying to defend them. You're looking for the answer that backs them up the most, not random "what if" scenarios or alternative hypotheticals. Just ask yourself, "What would make them believe my friend even more?"
they must have changed the font to make it harder to read. shit small asl
@mrinaliniv92 Also consider were looking for one that will most weaken even if C is somewhat correct, A kills the argument completely while C gives room for counter
@joycetheok Think of E as an example of what the passage is describing.
Non-NGF cells do not receive a target because they do not have NGF. This occurs in both humans and animals (line 4). Therefore, an embryo would be an example of this process. I struggled with this too. They def threw "embryo" in there to throw us off since the passage mainly referred animals
hi guys, how i eliminated D and chose C was by focusing on the fact that only one character's lines were very accurate. if the abridger was just a spectator watching the play, why would one person's lines be almost perfectly remembered but everyone else's be so sloppy? i mean, you could assume the spectator had a special interest in that one character, but that's adding an assumption. it seems much more reasonable that it was an actor who had played that role—they'd naturally remember their own lines much better than everyone else's. you could even tie it back to the first fact: they made the abridgment from memory because they didn't have a copy of the play.
i hate the lsat :)
@lexieminv13 indeed