Ugh I feel like (A) is a good trap answer here. I thought it was correct because I feel like the first and second paragraph do allude to timing, as they mention that stealing thunder can be used to soften the blow of something before opposing counsel does it.

I love Kevin's methods for reading comp! On my first PT I understood the passages and got some questions right, but I was terrible on time allocation. I feel like creating a low-resolution summary especially helped. It seemed like it made my recall a lot better.

@MateoAgudelo I personally thought it was ongoing because the author did not state whether a certain perspective should prevail over another. In that sense, each perspective can be used either for or against one of the others over and over again.

I got this question correct in 1:20 (only 4 seconds above target time), but I did not fully map out the conditional for the answer(s) I was almost stuck between. I concluded that (A) was wrong and (C) was correct because like the stimulus, (C)'s reasoning is derived from something that already happened. Meanwhile, (A) talks about the craft fair which has not yet occurred. Would anyone recommend analyzing other questions like this, or was this simply a fluke based on the wording of the stimulus and answer choices?

First NA question I have gotten correct (most of these questions I just barely miss the correct answer and fall for a trap answer).

I feel like what really helped me here was isolating the conclusion and then doing a quick mental check to see if it could still stand without the assumption each answer choice made.

@PaigeBlazevic While I have tried tactics like the negation test, I am still struggling because I feel like that can still be subjective.

Ugh I am so frustrated because E was what I initially wanted to answer however it seemed like too good/too strong of an argument to be true.

@Kofo omg thank you I did not see that at all

@JuanLandron Exact same thing has been happening to me since yesterday morning.

I watched this video but even when I do things as listed in this video I am not given the option to actually highlight the text. I think there might be a glitch. I currently have no highlight feature available at all when I do LR drills. If it is a glitch can this get fixed soon? Highlighting helps me a lot on LR especially conditional reasoning.

omg this was the first level 4 conditional reasoning question I have gotten correct (almost 3 weeks into beginning lsat prep, 1 week post beginning the foundations for conditional reasoning). I think translating it into lawgic really helps for this one as B verbatim mapped out what I had written down on my paper.

yay this was my first 3/3!