Oh boy here we go

Maybe i'm just being obtuse, but I feel like negating each answer choice to see if it breaks the argument takes too much time.

This video helped me understand SA questions A LOT:

Got this wrong because I need to brush up on my groups. I mapped out the chain correctly but forgot that "unless" = negate sufficient, which is answer choice D.

I got this wrong because I thought the right answer would address all the conditional elements in the stimulus. I'm also struggling to determine when to use Lawgic vs trying to solve the problem by reading the passage and picking the one that makes the most sense.

#feedback - Is this questions categorized correctly? It came up as an end-of-lesson drill for "Principle" type questions but it appears this questions is actually a PSA/Strengthen.

Ugh, i got hyper-fixated on the weird curveball sentence at the end and started looking at the ACs mindlessly to fill the logical gap. Treated this as an SA question instead of a MSS due to carelessness.

Ok but how do I do all of this in 90 seconds.

Another possible explanation of why A is wrong:

It reverses the relationship presented in the passage.

• The passage indicates that structurally, glass is not arranged in a fixed crystal structure like a solid (which may imply it's structured more like a liquid), but behaves as a solid below the glass transition temperature.

• What (A) claims: Glass behaves like a liquid, even though it structurally has properties of a solid

Didn't catch the difference between wealth/income and speed/acceleration until Blind Review.

Disregarded B because I thought "not adequately defending their view" was different from not providing evidence.