@Summer Someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I'm thinking that the actual questions will come with a passage that provides us with the context. (At least I hope so.)

This one is so confusing. Sometimes you're supposed to only use information that the passage gives you, but at other times using outside knowledge is needed...

@SavanahHoffstein Thank you

SO confused on this. It was never mentioned that 'some' is the negated version of 'all.' I understand how that makes sense but I'm starting believe these lessons aren't very comprehensive.

does "some A are not B" or "A <-s-> /B" work here as well? (Some Jedis do not have to use the force..?}

question 5 confused me. im not supposed to assume..and then I am?

This one is more confusing to me than Group 3. For Negate Necessary, are both statements (ADP → /A and A → /ADP) correct? Versus Negate Sufficient, where only one is correct?

@ShanR I should just focus on the word "every" more.

#2 is confusing me, because of the word impacts. My thinking was in order for the society to be endangered, impacts from space must happen.

@DouglasNeumeyer thank you for this explanation, I was confused as well

I guess a part of me feel likes Q2 could be switched around....but is it more of a "if, then" statement thing?