The disney argument is the strongest because it leaves no doubt between each of its claims as to the truth of the conclusion. The tiger argument is the second strongest because the burden of proof is lower -- the conclusion only claims that some mammals are dangerous, which it proves by giving an example of one dangerous mammal. However, it is weaker than the disney argument because the claim itself is weak. The cat argument is the weakest because its burden of proof is too high, and only utilizes one piece of circumstantial evidence.

Not entirely certain why I got it right but I guess I should trust POE more because it took 1:30 over time, just repeating in my head why the four other answers were wrong

"don't use the negation test in the real test" bro it took me two second to negation test B and E and got it right 30 seconds under the wire. that thing WORKS

No Resolve, Reconcile, or Explain...?

I got the question right, but had no idea why B was even "wrong" necessarily, I just thought A was logically stronger. That sufficient/necessary explanation cleared some things up that I think will help me avoid wrong answers in the future

Wouldn't having different moral convictions mean there is no consensus, and therefore no meaning?

Pliny was NOT of Aeschylus' time, he was Roman! That's a 600 year difference, there, video.