HAHAHAH

thanks for this!! I was stuck on E because I assumed comic "debris" might not be the same thing as explicit cosmic dust!!

real

loved this response. gotta match the LSAT writers freak I guess

Flaw questions are my biggest opp..... who has tips for these types of questions I just cannot get better

Interested!!! 561-358-6329

just frew up

NA questions are the fists and I am.... the punching bag

maybe I am deliriously tired right now but this comment made me audibly laugh so hard in this crowded coffee shop. thank you.

massively sucking in this section. literally have gotten 90% incorrect. looks like we will be repeating this module lol!

I've done 7 drills over two days. yes 7. finally on my last try I got 4/5 correct. REPETITION is the only way to get better at SA question types. keep going babes

retweet

this question is an automatic skip babes

this question made me schedule myself for botox next week

real

someone else commented this and it helped so much:

if the stem reads WEAKEN EXCEPT ; you are looking for something that STRENGTHENS or does NOTHING!!!

if the stem reads STRENGTHEN EXCEPT: you are looking for something that WEAKENS or does NOTHING!!!!!

the only way I got this one was POE...

this is a SKIP on test day baby

I got confused because the correct AC didn't mention sunscreen use so therefore even though B was more accurately weakening the argument, I still glazed it over and chose the trick!

this question......

Totally!! But with E you'd have to assume that his defence made people forgive or understand which is just a really big jump in assumption. Where would there be any support or reason for you to believe he successfully accomplished a PR campaign to get him back in good graces with the civilians? Where as A bridges the gap in assumptions with the stimulus we have in the given paragraph. Over half the city believes he's shady af but he is still able to pull the 52% percent rating because the people who DO LIKE HIM , do not believe he is guilty.

refusing to move on to the next question type until I am better at these. went back and reviewed some foundational lessons and watched a MBT question type live class and this is day two of trying to master these!

update , no not necessarily however during the MBT questions you pretty much need to map out all the formal logic during the higher level difficulty questions. although I can do a lot in my head or visually, its in our best interest to still try and master the Lawgic & mapping out the conditionals , once you get to MBT question types. for now though I can and will do the lower difficulty questions without the mapping! so at this level its totally fine and encouraged , but once you get into the material I would say its a mistake to not utilise the Lawgic.

just was saying how I'm able to do all these questions in my head easily with perfect timing and accuracy ......then we got to MBT questions... LOL

Amazing!! Im just staring my studying journey and this is very very inspiring!! Keep pushing but also be proud of yourself and reward yourself accordingly ;)