werent the dinosaurs on pangea??

Is the target time less than the time required to get the answer on the exam and still finish or equal to it? Like is it saying that if you get it in 45 seconds you're really ahead of the game? I got it in a minute :(

I freaking misread one that was asking for whats false >:(

Were A and E confusing the sufficient for the necessary?

I HAD IT RIGHT AND CHANGED IN THE BLIND REVIEW

I GOT D AND CHOSE B IN BLIND REVIEW >:(

I will test this by throwing an absolute missile at a 10 year old at skyzone

The wording of A killed me :c

Is P1 also a sub conclusion? thats how i interpreted it to justify the lifting of restrictions.

I was doing this in a drill and it was my last question and i submitted before answering it >:( but i got it correct in blind review lol

Is it okay to say that many deals with quantites while some deals with proportions? Like some could be >0% while many could be 0.01% of a very large quantity.

For all of the exercies in 19, why is the winner part put in terms of A? Every comparative is some variation of which/when is x lesser, and, because A is always no less (equal to or greater than), B should be the potential winner (with the caveat that it can be equal to A). When I went about these exercises, I answered like so:

"The success rate of this experimental treatment is no less than that of common treatments for the same disease.

1. experimental treatment vs common treatment

2. which has a lesser success rate for treating the same disease

3. common treatment is equal/less."

I undertand that saying A doesn't win and could potentially tie is essentially the same as saying B may win or tie. Is the point of structuring step three in terms of A that while we can determinedly say that A does not win (as it either ties or loses) more concrete than choosing B as a winner while indicating that the winner has a possibility of tieing? Or are the two logically equivalent, and this is just a different way of putting it?

Out of curiosity is it a good general rule of thumb to eliminate commonalities in A and B? When I paused to analyze this sentence, my A & B were some cultivars of corn's morpholigical relationship to sorghum vs some cultivars of corn's morpholigical relationship to othe cultivars of corn. I arrived at the same steps two and three; however, my step one differed slightly and was a bit more circuitous.

Is another shallow dip reason to get rid of E that there was no uncertainty in the reasoning?

I freaking was gonna pick C and used schizophrenia to frame it but i didnt because i thought i was using outside knowledge :(

Wait is b RAA?

Ok so i took it and got a 3/5 then took it again twice and got two 5/5s. Look for the question on drugs T and S i think its PCT S2 13. It's a class going over it and it was so helpful

E sucks it's preying on a misread >:(

I waffeled between E and A and chose A because I thought E was a trap :c

Im so pissed I didn't read lacks and got rid of all the fuzzy ones >:(

I GOT IT but in 2:42 >:(