I got it right after a blind review when I diagramed everything out. I want to get to a point where I can just read the answers and know it intuitively.
A bit confused here.
A - "while this style of vase is not currently sought after by other collectors..." I am taking this to mean, it is not desirable. Therefore, A seems like an appealing choice to me. Is this not a good way to think because it does not mention if Matilde desires the vase but just that other people do?
B - "although the seller is willing to take back the vase if Matilde cannot independently authenticate it..." I am taking this to mean that is not confident purchasing it. I guess this is also not the right way to think about the answer choice since it doesn't mention/allude to that she isn't confident in purchasing it.
4/5. getting more comfortable taking my time with these 5 question sets.
Is it recommended to write out the notes? Visuals do help, but I feel like it can take a lot of time.
See title.
7Sage breaks down and teaches types of content for the LSAT, and then lets you practice the concepts taught in the practice modules; however, I've been told you need at least 300+ hours of studying to do well on the LSAT (achieving a score in 160s+).
Does this 300+ hours exclude the work prior to the practice modules?
I was thinking the first sentence was just context, not a premise for the subsidiary conclusion.
Do you always recommend skipping answers like C that have extra information as soon as you see the extra info? I'd be afraid to skip the answer moving too quickly.
"which clearly harms the dismissed employees as well as the sense of security of the retained employees." - is this a subconclusion/major premise?
the premise of this subconclusion being "attempts to increase productivity decrease the number of employees."
@StephenKim from answers down below, it seems to not be an argument because it is an action of irrefutable truth. we're both aware that I'm hugging you - it cannot be disputed. versus, an argument is something I'm trying to convince you is true e.g. "everyone requires hugs because they are lonely." that claim is disputable - maybe a lonely person doesn't want/require a hug to feel less lonely.
Any tips on how thoroughly I should be reviewing my answers if I got them correct?