- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
Admissions profile
Discussions
I've gotten every single one right in this section except for this one BECAUSE I DIDN'T READ THE QUESTION STEM!
don't be like me. always read the question stem.
facepalm. I originally chose A, but then second-guessed myself.
This would mess with me because I assume hastened meant to make cease.
God is good. He gave me a brain that knew how to get this answer right. Now I can not give up on my LSAT journey
This was super easy for me, and I'm not particularly a whizz.
It just made sense for A to be right because it states at the beginning that you must have an exemplary record, and Penn did not.
God is good.
I got this right, by reminding myself not to overthink, but I feel like the really easy questions sometimes make me doubt whether or not I answered the question correctly.
Guess it makes sense that getting some wrong is part of the strategy.
The goal is to be able to see the patterns for correct answers well as quickly as possible. With that, some answers could be wrong.
After completing the Foundation lessons, and now doing the LR lessons, I feel the Foundation Lessons were grueling and a bit boring to get through, but now that I'm doing LR, I'm glad I went through the Foundations.
I'm having fun learning about LR and applying the knowledge from the Foundation lessons.
Anyone else feel this way?
I'm not even gonna lie, the answer got me a little heated
It's somewhere in the beginning of the foundations. I can't find the exact spot, but it is explained.
Personally, since the LR lessons started, this was the hardest question for me. Had to really think for a second, but still answered correctly.
My "I'm-a-well-paid-tobacco-industry-lawyer suit," tells me Philip did nothing wrong. Coincidences sure are interesting.
I too am a Cat for Capitalism. I'm tired of all these strays living off the welfare Kible I work so hard for my human to get.
After going through a bunch more lessons, this makes sense. Thank you.
So, is Kumar not necessarily late because the necessary condition is "only if" they arrive 5+ minutes late and we don't know if for EXAMPLE, there are other conditions to not be late such as, if they arrive 5+ minutes late with a note then they are not late? We just know that Kumar might be late or not?
I'm pretty confused, not gonna lie.
lol, I also don't love it, but most of the world is ok with it, and everyone is different.
For me, it's part of being a Christian trying to be a lawyer, and understanding most of the world is secular.
You're not alone though.
Spelling error in 17.3, Step 3.
It says, "You take that number and divid it by the watermelon's weight." "divid" I believe is supposed to be "divide." Appreciate ya'll!
I'm interested!