So my friend told me that the practice tests are the most important when it comes to succeeding with the LSAT. Is that true?
Wouldn’t it be to go through all the videos and understanding them more important?
Can somebody please explain to me why it is important to negate quantifiers?
I mean I understand the whole point of being able to quantify statements, but how does knowing how to negate quantifying statements going to benefit?
Who else had to make a side note NOT to confuse MSS and MBT due to MBT's phrasing of its question stem?
I mean, the two types of LR question types are not far off from each other, it is still important to be able to distinguish the two from. each other.
This is a little confusing...
- "Many" is a large amount
- However it is not equivalent to "Most"
- Safer to say it is equivalent to "Some"
Kind of makes sense because one could say there are many people who use a PlayStation over an Xbox.
Statistically, that could mean 1% to 99% of people in the US do.
I could be wrong though.
- 52% - 99%
- Could even be 100%.. sure.
- Not common in the real LSAT. Thank goodness.
Most and Some having a possibility of meaning ALL is giving me the heebie jeebies
Hey everyone I plan on taking the LSAT in April. I live in Houston Heights! Text me your name xxxxxxxxxx
Okay y'all here's my 2 cents even though nobody asked:
In a weaken argument, the conclusion is implied to be an assumption which is FALSE.
I think it is safe to NOT look for the smart answer.
Instead you should go for the answer choice that is talking about what is RELEVANT in the premise and conclusion, EVEN IF, the answer choice sounds dumb.
So my friend told me that the practice tests are the most important when it comes to succeeding with the LSAT. Is that true?
Wouldn’t it be to go through all the videos and understanding them more important?
FINALLY GOT ONE RIGHT!!!
Is it normal that I am very confused?
Okay... this is kinda confusing.