User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Joined
Aug 2025
Subscription
Live
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Tuesday, Sep 30

I did what he did in the video and got the answers he got in the videos correct. But on the actual questions when I clicked view answer, I got it wrong.

PrepTests ·
PT111.S3.Q18
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Tuesday, Sep 30

I did it wrong because when the answer choice was the contrapositive I matched within the contrapositive. Like B I saw in the contra that tgs is required for sophisticated listener. I was reading it all wrong like that but now I understand I need to keep reflecting back to original statement . The contra was confusing me when doing it. I don't think I was reading it as not also.

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Tuesday, Sep 30

#2 got me I was confused and did j-kbr or j-/k-r. I didn't know until now with or you could do /f-y and /y-f. It did help

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Sep 14

does the order matter bc I did like this for number 3 No birds are trees.

T->/B

B->/T and

Answer was...

bird → /tree

tree → /bird

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Sep 14

for questions like #1 instead of putting the / I put in my abbreviation did not increase is that ok? Im still doing same like thus

In surrounding counties, where hunting is permitted, the size of the deer population has not increased in the last eight years.

HP->SDPNI

/SDPNI->/HP

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Sep 14

For question 4 I saw the word some as one of the main concepts and linked the other part together. I keep doing that...

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Sep 14

On 1,2 and 3 I did it backwards. Like NSA-> NR when was NR-> NSA

I also got mixed up with 5...

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Sep 14

when a puppies owners leave, the dog cries

1.when

2.a puppies owners leave, the dog cries

  1. pol, dc

  2. pol->dc

  3. /dc->/pol

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Saturday, Sep 13

Ok I am so confused.

For some reason I did..

SC -> I

/h -> I

/I -> SC

how do you know not to do the arrows and to make it in exponent form?

PrepTests ·
PT104.S3.P3.Q19
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Nov 13

Why did I eliminate the right answer?

I eliminated B because I didn't really get that vibe from the paragraph where it was stated. I just more so read the sentence as a small blow or discreditment or even a like example of other things being able to do it. I think I eliminated B due to me interpreting it wrong.

Why did I choose this wrong answer?

I chose C because I feel by the passage saying "short range species" it in a way discredited the fact that it could be long term. I can see how B is correct now though because similarly since it said "short term species" it could be trying to tell us to reconsider it since its a system of many short range species which is similar to what I chose in a way.

What can I do better next time to get this right?

I can read more carefully when going through the passage and comparing to the answer choices. I can also try to x all answer choices but one.

Additional notes:

This one had me a little confused because in a way I feel B and C are saying similar things which led me to choose the incorrect answer. I do understand how B could be correct though, I just need to work on my instinct and power of elimination.

PrepTests ·
PT104.S3.P3.Q15
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Nov 13

Why did I eliminate the right answer?

I eliminated the correct answer due to me being quite stuck on this question. I was torn between three choices and ended up going with my gut. I eliminated B since I hadn't thought it wasn't satisfactorily identified completely at first but when doing my blind review I realized that was correct and I misinterpreted some of the information.

Why did I choose this wrong answer?

I chose D since when reading the passage I saw a lot about how experimental it was for the process of the homing pigeons and they did a lot of research throughout the process/ different experiments which led me to think D was right. I can see now though that, that may have happened throughout the passage but doesn't really seem to be a main idea just an observation of what happens in the passage.

What can I do better next time to get this right?

I can read more throroughly and do better on my lo-rise summaries to better know the main idea of the passage. That has been a bit hard for me to do.

Additional notes:

PrepTests ·
PT103.S4.P3.Q18
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Nov 13

Why did I eliminate the right answer?

I eliminated the correct answer, E, because I was torn between D and E and went with my instinct, D. They are two similar choices. I had felt E could be correct but ended up going with D.

Why did I choose this wrong answer?

I chose d because the author did say it "may be a contributing factor" which made me think that the author didn't seem too convinced on the fact that it is a contributing factor.

What can I do better next time to get this right?

I see that I may have assumed a little bit so I can work better on not jumping to assumptions. I can see how E connects more to the passage and isn't as much of a jump.

Additional notes:

PrepTests ·
PT103.S4.P3.Q14
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Nov 13

Why did I eliminate the right answer?

I eliminated D because when reading the authors explanation I looked more at how the author was stating refuting evidence to the researchers claim. I more so saw one alternative explanation to the massive die off which made me to eliminate D.

Why did I choose this wrong answer?

I chose B because when reading the authors last paragraph I felt the author was giving us their reasoning for how the illnesses could be correctly diagnosed/ why the researcher didn't diagnose it completely right.

What can I do better next time to get this right?

I can read into it better. When reading it now I do understand how the correct answer is correct. B is a little foggy and confusing because I guess we aren't being given a specific process. I can see D because I guess the evidence could be alternative explanations for each thing I just didn't interpret it as possible explanations. So in the future I can take my time better on each question to better understand.

Additional notes:

PrepTests ·
PT103.S4.P3.Q20
User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Nov 13

This had me stuck... Why did I eliminate the right answer?

I was torn between the right answer C and the answer I chose B but in the end chose B on both attempts. I eliminated C because when reading the passage I didn't connect P. Brevis too much. I just didn't see too much of a connect with C as I did B. It had me stuck.

Why did I choose this wrong answer?

I chose B because when reading the passage I saw that both the author and researchers emphasized on the synthetic pollutants. I do see how I could have made too much of a jump when deciding though since the synthetic pollutants aren't mentioned closely to the Atlantic sentence or gulf sentence. I just felt it was making a comparison when bringing the gulf up.

What can I do better next time to get this right?

I can not jump to assumptions and read/ interpret my information more carefully. Take my time.

Additional notes:

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Saturday, Sep 13

So say I'm Lubbock, Texas.

To be in Lubbock it is necessary that I am in Texas. To be in Texas it is necessary that I am in the USA.

Lubbock is a subset of Texas and USA is a superset to Texas.

It is sufficient if I live in Texas to be in Lubbock and sufficient to be in the USA if im in Texas?

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Friday, Sep 12

I got B I didn't consider the fact that it doesn't go both ways

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Tuesday, Sep 09

I think the trash argument is weakest because it doesn't have a good indicator like therefore, the word hypothesis could throw you off because isn't always a good indicator.

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Tuesday, Sep 09

I didn't know where I was when I woke up this morning after a night out. I had a lot of shots with my friends while out. Therefore, I didn't know where I was since I drank a lot while out.

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Monday, Oct 06

This is frustrating. I get it wrong but in the video it shows I did it correct with his reasoning. Like #1 for example the answer in the video and the question are different views.

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Oct 05

On number 5 in the video explanation I got it right but in the question wrong.

I'm also confused because in some questions it'll say if... but won't put it in front of the arrow as the sufficent?

Im so confused.

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Sunday, Oct 05

It just keeps getting more complicated

User Avatar
kaleighh.04
Thursday, Oct 02

I'll be getting wrong on the question like #4 but then in the video it shows I did it right.

Confirm action

Are you sure?