hahahah c is SO fox news love it

HELP - I picked D and then in the blind review changed it to C because of the differences between the words "uncomfortable" and "comfortable" in answer D

from the stim: "but if a public place is uncomfortable, it is not well-designed, and all comfortable public places have spacious interiors"

are we able to assume that the negation of uncomfortable is comfortable? I thought there were no assumptions on Must be True, answers had to be directly from the text. Wouldn't the negation of "uncomfortable" be "not un-comfortable"

on the range of comfortable, there is:

1) uncomfortable

2) NOT uncomfortable

3) kind of comfortable

4) etc.

5) etc.

6)comfortable

or should I be focusing on the fact that C was taking a bigger risk by saying Most coffee houses as we don't know how much of coffee houses make up the superset of public places

#feedback would love videos to come back for long text sections :)

Just pointing out something that I assume may come up on or apply to a future LR lesson?

I made a note about the use of "HOME" instead of "NURSING HOME" in sentence 3/ premise 2...

Keeping the ideal experiment practice in mind could we say that premise 2 stating that pets "make one's time at HOME more rewarding" does not strengthen the argument that time with a pet at a NURSING HOME is rewarding. In the context it states that MANY nursing homes have prohibitions against having pets so the argument would be better suited with data directly from NURSING HOMES from the subset of many that do allow pets?

Or maybe I am doing too much detective work and reading a bit much into details and just finished my second coffee and need to chill. lol

I will score a 175+ on the April LSAT - thank you for the motivation brad <3

hear me out, for Q4: if you were really determined to use the rule and exception framework could you change the "if it shelters more than 50 animals" to "unless it shelters 50 or less than 50 animals"

exception becomes: "shelters that shelter 50 or less than 50 animals"

rule: adoption centers with 10 years of continuous operations --> supported by mittens foundation

or am I just making it more convoluted and making it so that the argument loses its meaning?

this was a great analysis. thank you!!

Hi Kevin!!! You will be missed JY

hell yeaa!

we are soo back! yay

finally! i'm back! we have got this!