If I see a similar question to this on the exam, I'll crash out, cry, and skip it because ain't nobody got time for that.

#feedback

I think the largest problem with this question is that it does not address the importance of 'will' in the argument. By changing 'will' to 'won't', it fundamentally makes the question wrong because blackouts have several means of occurring, whereas 'don't' does not necessarily mean they won't happen, but it rules out the possibility of a heatwave causing the problem.

I think the majority of this concern could have been avoided if you provided a flipped version of 'If the heatwave abates, then blackouts won't occur'.

TLDR: Regardless of how you flip it, the word 'will' implies that it is necessary for blackouts to occur if there is a heatwave, thus making it (heatwaves) your sufficient condition regardless of negation.

I'm not necessarily the greatest fan of 'Lawgic'. I'd prefer a method to break down the massive questions on the LSAT quickly without having to take time to draw up maps or scientific notation. Unfortunately, I have no alternative ideas than shortening the general idea down currently.

Actively getting my ass handed to me here.

these questions are going to be the end of me

I should have read the question better, I chose C prior to blind review as I thought it was what the stem was SUPPORTING, not REJECTING! Glad I caught it on blind review.

yeah this one went right over my head. Uh oh.

zamn everybody got bad relationships... but a 95 ain't shabby

#feedback it's a crime that you would put so many banger paragraphs in here and NOT have them voiced over with a video.

"Or if you're impatient, you could capture some dolphins, put them in a tank with some blooming algae and fish, then watch to see what happens. All while stroking Mr. Fat Cat and twirling your mustache, of course. If the dolphins die, then congratulations! You're an evil motherfucker. If the dolphins live, then you're just gonna have to find another way to kill dolphins."

Peak.

This question beat me, robbed me, and hung me by my ankles in the streets.

So just to make sure I'm correct: In order to find the strongest hypothesis, we just ask 'how'? I feel like that might be intuitive if we had more than a minute and a half per question... Someone clear it up for me please!

#feedback i love you <3