Any advice on working through questions like these when we can't actually annotate the blurb (i mean you can but it makes the process much longer than it would on paper and I don't see that being feasible for how quickly this test moves). Everything he does is based in the ability to annotate, but we can't do so quickly on a computer

as a scientist this one was rough because C-14 in soil very much comes from living things but we don't know that from the stim -- so hard not to bring in outside information ugh

more drills (maybe optional ones) wold be VERY helpful! #feedback

#help -- any tips on not reading this as two separate conditionals? Because it was an A>b>c, I was looking for an A>B>C which few have because there aren't enough premises/conditional statements.

Why isn't Q2 a group 4 situation. #feedback The fact this isn't included in the explanation seems like an obvious oversight here.

#feedback I am not sure why the difficulty doesn't slowly get harder. Having a chain of easy questions and then a super hard one like this just makes people feel dejected and stupid, which is not conducive for studying.

#feedback i dont think this sentence is written correctly: this shows that reading these label labels promotes proportionally less consumption of fat

(i think it repeats label mistakenly)

#feedback why isn't the video above the written text like usual? I didn't know there was a video option but as someone who learns better with the video, that should be first as it usually is. Having it last made it seem like there wouldn't be one.

anyone have advice or an explanation on why the development would not be the reduction in staff?

So i am confused honestly because we were told that negating it would help to find the necessary assumption, but if you negate A, the argument is clearly impossible. Any advice on another trick to use considering this one screwed me here