My low res was different. Again. :(
The economists are naive.
you emphasizing his bald head is killing me. I'm pretty sure he would have died too if he had hair if the drop was from high enough to kill him instantly.
Perhaps a turtle should have dropped on Agamemnon's head instead
My sensitive self: I see why it’s the right answer, but it’s mean. thinks about what his daughter must have thought if she heard that and wastes time
This course is such a godsend. I’ve been in so many LSAT programs and none nearly broke it down as comprehensively and methodically as this. I thought it was me but it was the lack of a well-developed curriculum. This is great.
This was a hard read for a social welfare major. I think Luigi’s case shows that not all choices can be rationalized with the economic incentive framework.
I think my confidence in this section went from a 8 to a 3 with these last two questions.
the LSAT writers are really awful. I can't be the only person who noticed this was question number 11. Coming across this difficult and confusing of a question would have been so demoralizing and distracting early on. If the parallel question is lower in number, is that an indicator that we ought to expect to be able to abstract the flaw without mapping it out? #help
I was doing great on this section until this question. Just happened to be the one you can't discern the answer from using the shape of the argument.
Emotionally, this is like having your teeth pulled by a back alley dentist without anesthetic. For some reason, it gives me flashbacks of being locked in a hot car as a toddler on a hot summer day in Texas while wondering if your parent lost track of time or forgot you were in the car. Can't get out of the car, but the heat and inability to breathe tamper with your ability and will to find a way out of the hot car. It must be the despair.
thank you for being real. This has been my experience.
Congratulations on making it this far. You're almost 70 percent done with Logical Reasoning! You have done so much and so well. I am patting myself on the back. You should, too.
10/11. Woo!!! Wish LR was just this.
They must have thrown us this softball because most of us got thoroughly air fried on the last one.
so this is why there was such a soft intro in the beginning. Someone said a question before that it felt like the quiet before a storm and their prediction was indeed true.
diabolically worded question.
Thank god the correct answer stood out, or else I would have been tricked by B. Could anyone explain how the hypothetical precludes B? I don't understand how.
what the helly
Hi. I almost always find that I take twice the amount of time 7sage predicts I'll need or more to truly absorb the lessons, and I need significant breaks in-between to decompress. I thought I would be able to get through the entire course quickly in the beginning, but it got difficult as it started delving into logical reasoning. I find myself feeling lucky to get through 5-15 lessons a day. How many lessons does everyone try to do each day?
if I see a question where the answer will hinge upon determining the size of sets relative to one another, should we just stipulate numbers to the sets first to kind of imagine what is going on, or simply be drawn to the answer that helps us to determine the size of the sets in the interest of time? It was very difficult for me to just visualize/fathom an answer that would justify the conclusion on a question like this. It would be faster for me to just check if the conditions of each answer choice trigger the validity of the conclusion. #help
You have already come this far. Don't give up!
the inner machinations of Smith's mind are an enigma.
would we be able sort of kick up into the domain that the aliens are "less intelligent than we are" because they both appear in the two main conditional statements as sufficient conditions? by kicking that statement up into the domain we would be more clearly able to see that P(not being able to send a spacecraft)->C (inability to verify existence) because we would it be to see clearer that the gap we have to fill is that confirming that being unable to send a spacecraft would lead us to conclude that we are unable to verify the existence of aliens given the domain (the aliens are not as intelligent as we are->they cannot communicate with us)? #help #feedback
I love it so much