I just received my June 2025 LSAT scores, and I am very pleasantly surprised. I began studying for the June LSAT on April 7th, took my first untimed practice test on April 10th, and got a 153 (practice test 140). I wasted three weeks practicing with the Princeton Review LSAT guidebook, and learned about 7sages from Reddit. I spent 5-10 hours a day for 34 days watching videos at double speed so I could get through the material faster. I got a 169 and can't believe it. I thought the June LSAT was the hardest test I'd ever taken (LSAT or other). You guys can do it, I highly recommend you don't do it the way I did (I am trying to catch the end of the 2025 cycle at the very last minute), but you can do it. I did it in the stupidest way possible, and it worked and I'm done!
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
I got the most from the lesson plan (trying every question before the lesson videos, and then hammering the drills on medium hard hardest until I would get all of them correct). After getting through the syllabus, I drilled where I felt the weakest until there were no 4/5 or 5/5 difficulty questions left.
It took four tries but I finally got 100%!!
The very in "very viscous" almost threw me off.
That comparison between glass and cheese he made in the first paragraph video is really coming in clutch here.
I'm sorry, is he saying he took "astronomy for presidents"? And if he is, what exactly distinguishes astronomy in general from astronomy for chief executives?
14/15 on medium! Knocking on wood that I can keep this up
Correct and only 4 seconds over, huge for the squad.
Getting the last one wrong I am the stupidest boy in all the world. God should strike me down so I do not shame my family with a dishonorable lsat performance.
Gets this one right I am God??
#feedback
Why answer C is correct has been poorly explained, and this video should be redone with a much more thorough explanation. I largely understand why the other 4 are incorrect, but I do not understand why C is correct.
Target time 59 seconds is crazy
I thought that's what you're supposed to do for necessary assumption questions. Will that work for most sufficient assumption questions?
I'm getting a lot of these questions right, but I'm really struggling to do so in the proper time frame. Are you guys getting these questions right in the suggested time frame? What are your strategies for doing so? I took 40 seconds too long on this one, and I don't know how I could have gone through the stimulus/answer choices faster.
Some of the best advice I've gotten for these types of questions is to follow these steps. It doesn't involve lawgic but that doesn't mean you shouldn't use logic to improve the method.
-Identify the conclusion, premises, and the assumption of the author.
-Look for language in the conclusion that is not accounted for in the premise.
-Paraphrase an answer that would strongly connect the premise to the conclusion and shore up the language gap.
-Eliminate answer choices that bring in new information.
(I got this from the Princeton Review lsat study guide which doesn't use lawgic in answering sufficient assumptions. I find that it is a weaker process than 7sages method, but using pieces of both methods helps your intuition A LOT).
I've been getting these questions right, but the time it's taking me to answer them is skyrocketing.
I legitimately don't understand why this is a hard question. I got it right in 91 seconds, but I feel I did it wrong because I went through the answers without mapping out any causal chain or putting it into lawgic. All the other answers were just wrong in some way and B didn't have anything wrong with it and was in line with the text. I worry that if I'm not mapping out the chain of support like I see in the other comments then I will run into issues down the line, but for this specific question, I don't even understand how the other answers could be construed as right.
Okay, so there's no reason you need to know this for the LSAT (this isn't even why I got the question right), but when Shakespeare wrote his plays, he did not write out his scripts in their entirety for the use of the actors involved in production. Individual parts were written out and given to actors, with the preceding line written out so they would know when their dialogue would resume. From what I remember, complete copies of Shakespearean scripts were produced only after his death, when members of his theater company came together and wrote out the full scripts so that they could be preserved for posterity.
I got so confused that I didn't map it out, and I guess intuitively understood that A - D were invalid and E was technically not not valid. That still took 2 minutes and 37 seconds. I don't understand how I would be able to map it out and correctly identify the answer in a minute and 48 seconds.
I was able to map everything out well, but I'm wasting a ton of time writing out every contrapositive because I'm not sure if I'll need it. Should I be chaining everything out first, and then take the contrapositive, or do I need to write every conditional contrapositive individually and just get faster?
Every time I submit my comment it changes my formatting, nevermind.
Shouldn't "proposal" be kicked up to the domain? So it would be >25% and 25% or /<50).
Shouldn't the upper limit of some be all minus 1? Some implies a portion (regardless of how large the portion) but not all.
I'm confused, is "never" one of the indicator words for negate necessary? I assumed yes when answering the question (the indicator words for necessary conditions include "always", so it makes enough sense that it is included), but the previous video lesson only listed four (no, none, not both, cannot).
I still took one practice test a week (usually on Sundays, though on some weeks I did skip) and then took the nine practice tests at the end of the syllabus. I definitely utilized practice tests, just wasn't my main focus.