LMAO I went down to the comments knowing someone would mention this hahahha.
bro I thought the, "one cannot be sure" was the conclusion lol. So does this "one cannot be sure" play as the premise in the argument?
so its okay to bring outside info for E? because that was such a implicit assumption the argument made lowkey. I didnt even question why get the qualified teachers in that region if you can em elsewhere.
Does it matter if the NA stimulus uses an analogy in its premise or conclusion? I noticed with the last one too it was in the conclusion.
Only if is a necessary condition, so whatever comes after only if is necessary and the sentence before it is sufficient.
so for E it would be like this:
if not rely on quackery instead of S valid info — > more harm than good.
but in this context and for this answer choice, I didn't diagram E, I just read it how it was and when it said relying on quackery is where I decided to eliminate it. because that's not the only way people can do harm to themselves.
and whenever you see the word unless, just replace it with "if not".
example
Tisha likes to go to the movies, unless she is sick.
if not sick ---> likes to go to movies.
the remaining first part of the sentence before unless moves to the necessary condition without changing anything. LMK if that helped lol.
been wondering that for 23 years now. JK lmao
so we cared about an exemplary record because it was bi-conditional? what if it wasn't? would the AC's that mention Pen not having exemplary record yet she saved a life would make it correct?
I ended up choosing the right one but I still lowkey didn't like C because of the last part that said, "farm animals", I was like okay but it only talked about cows, what if that wouldn't work for other farm animals? Did anyone else think about that? how do I avoid this?
Ahh I ended up choosing the wrong answer because B said, "changes in peoples feelings about life" I was like well what if its just one aspect that they changed their feelings about and not life in general lmao. How do I avoid this process of thought? its hard to know when to not be too critical.
Hi, so I was wondering if someone could tell me the difference between pseudo sufficient assumption - find the rule, questions versus principle questions? and if you can tell me how you identify the question type from one another please??
Thankyouuu in advance!.
Thank you sooo much! yes this fs helped!
bro I thought the first sentence was the C, I even tested it, both ways made sense, how do I not make the same mistake? even tho I still got it right lol.
I choose C but I'm still wondering this too
Would we read Miranda if this was a weakening question?
Okay so dumb question, so when he says we widened the similarity, did he mean the similarity between the conclusion and other cities?
fr i got a reminder for that shit
Maybe this will help https://7sage.com/lsat_explanations/lsat-53-section-3-question-01/
bro ofc A, rip, I just didnt wanna assume it but then I guess it was safe to assume that.