I'm also curious

#feedback this section needs to be updated, there no longer is a LG section.

woke up so fast

As a philosophy minor, RC is starting to make so much more sense if I approach it the way I approach philosophical texts.

start writing them down, slowly try shortening them, and eventually see if you can do it in your head, if not just stick with the shortened written ones.

I keep 2nd guessing myself on these RC questions ):

#help , i dont see the closed captions option or speed option on this video

this was a hard watch...

Mapping things out and writing things out helps me SO much. It is adding time, so I don't know how to feel about that, but I'm happy that I'm getting things right now!

finally got one right HAHA

im dying here

I feel that I am getting worse at these, I'm so unmotivated ):

these are so hard ):

my dumb self didn't even see shark SKELETONS, i read it as shark teeth twice

oh my gawd these are hard

SAME LOL

Oh boy I got tricked!!!!

#feedback This was SO GOOD and so easy to understand!! Such great explanations were done!

I wonder the same thing because if we are creating it in our heads, so many different variations of hypothesis would be created. I'm assuming that we are to read between the lines and determine hypothesis through that.

When is your test?

literally suffering through the last 3 lessons fr.

I think you're supposed to practice enough times to where it becomes 2nd hand nature for you to digest such passages/sentences. But I agree, these past couple sections have confused me like no other. I think I'm going to study but then come back to them because nothing makes sense to me.

#help for question 2, why are both sides negated at the end instead of one? Is it simply because the conclusion wouldn't be valid if they weren't both negated?

i wonder the same thing

If it is simpler for us to draw the conclusion without the lawgic symbols, can we just ignore the lawgic symbol step?