I am preparing to take the LSAT in August and was wondering if there are any groups who have regular meetings that are also taking the test at the same time.
- Joined
- Apr 2025
- Subscription
- Free
These past lession ive just been speeding through it because it got complex real quick#feedback#help
#feedback #help hello there, when it is written "The students who mastered logic saw improvements in their PrepTest scores." How come it is not mastered-->improvements or vise verse?
#feedback #help can you explain #11 in greater detail?
#feedback #help Hi there, for #3 can this also be correct:
/Volume->/discounts
HSV->PB
----
discount-> PB
#feedback # help for 5 is this also correct: 1. A society begins to decline only when its politicians become corrupt.
"Only" introduces a neccessary condition (Group 2).
decline → corrupt
/corrupt→ /decline
2. If any member of society's elite is corrupted, revolution will follow.
"If " introduces a sufficient condition (Group 1).
corrupt → revolution
/revolution -> /corrupted
Let's connect it all together
decline->corrupt->revolution
Contrapositive of the chain above (reverse entire chain and turn positives to negatives, turn negatives to positives)
/revolution->/corrupt->/decline
#feedback #help I am not sure how in order is a conditional indicator
#feedback #help I am having trouble putting together all of the broken down lawgic. For example #2 is /B → R → A → /S.
#feedback #help Regarding conditionals starting with if: If a conditional sentence begins with if, but has words like must or cannot, is it still a group 1 conditional? Why? In what case is it not a group 1 conditional even if it begins with if?
#help Hello, is 3.1 translation to lawgic not starting off with negating one side because there is already negation in the sentence?
#feedback #help
Why the switch in answers from clause 1 and clause 2 to subject and predicate?
#help I do not understand this, can someone help: If we reflect on the experimental design here, there’s a huge issue: there’s no random selection. Instead, the groups self-selected. Self-selection introduces confounding factors, such as that identified in (D): joggers who are more prone to injuries tend to stretch more often. This provides an alternative explanation of the study results and effectively weakens the argument.
I put the speed to x2.6 and nod my head and blink my eyes at the same speed.
#help I finished answering the five questions then I accidentally pressed the home icon and it would not let me submit it. So I refreshed the page and now I have to restart all over again.
I knew A was wrong, nevertheless the videos explanation, because it does not resolve the discrepancy but merely restates the main idea
#feedback #help for claims like x is b or Luke is a Jedi, can't we just put x = b or L = J instead of xB or Lj?
#feedback #help Hi, can I get a full preview of the admissions timeline? Please
Hey guys, I requested to join the groupme
The principle is correct. Even Plato believes in collective responsibility of "One messes up, all mess up."
When confronted with a strengthening question, apply the steps below:
Read the question stem to find out if it is a strengthening question.
Read the stimulus and run a ‘Why’ test before highlighting the main conclusion.
Figure out which one of the multiple choice questions strengthen or support the main conclusion. (Elimate answer choices that are neutral or weakening)
Narrow it down to two answer choices
Hi Dayana,
Truly, you're not alone in this struggle... NA has been a migraine for me too. But here’s a framework that’s helped me get MBT questions right:
Imagine the stimulus is a racetrack with a finish line. Before the finish line stands a dog. After the finish line sits a cat.
What is necessary for me to reach the cat?
– I must reach the finish line.
Why? Because the cat is after the finish line, so reaching it requires I’ve already passed the finish line. In other words, reaching the finish line is necessary to reach the cat.
#help I did not understand how "the state of affairs' refers to "economic policies were not changed".
This explanation was so long
I'm in Pyongyang
#feedback 19th century is medivevil?