Is there a way to know the analysis on this question and questions where JY walks us through? I want to be able to see what PT this came from and the level of difficulty, because this definitely felt like a lv 3 or 4.
Should I be watching these full breakdowns if I am consistently getting the answers correct in the practice questions and when I look at the question before watching the video?
Off topic subject. On average, how long do you guys study for? I try to do at least an hour every day but juggling my coursework with this is challenging. I'm taking the LSAT in June. How are you guys holding up?
This question is great to also mention how two answers may seem identical in a sense but there's always something about one of those answers that has less assumptions. With C we are talking about making better nutritional choices against sweet commercials on TV. With B we are talking about physical exercise and health with sweet commercials. Which would make the most sense to you. Of course it would be the nutritional choices against sweet commercials because we are talking about that same set (food).
For people like me who write down the "review" portion of every lesson, copy and paste the transcript of the lesson in ChatGPT and ask to format a review for information pertaining to MSS questions (or whatever is being covered) and not pertaining to the specific question itself.
#feedback It would be helpful to have a difficulty comparison with the average LSAT q on these. I get a really good handle on these example q's in the lessons, but do not want to be overconfident when approaching real drill sets :)
Can someone please clarify to me why B is not also an equally appropriate answer? In my understanding, both answers B and C serve to "protect" children from "some form of harm" whether the harm is unhealthy foods or deceptive television advertisements.
In the lesson, J.Y. says “All soft drinks and candies? No – the soft drinks and candies advertised on television shows directed towards children.” This being the case, it seems to me the reason that B is wrong is not because it is about television advertisements but because B talks about “deceptive and misleading,” and the stimulus does not do this. But what if B were something like, “that television advertisements can lull one into making poor choices”? B would then align with the fact that we are talking about soft drinks and candies advertised on television.
Subscribe to unlock everything that 7Sage has to offer.
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to get going. Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you can continue!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you came here to read all the amazing posts from our 300,000+ members. They all have accounts too! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to discuss anything!
Hold on there, stranger! You need a free account for that.
We love that you want to give us feedback! Just create a free account below—it only takes a minute—and then you’re free to vote on this!
Subscribers can learn all the LSAT secrets.
Happens all the time: now that you've had a taste of the lessons, you just can't stop -- and you don't have to! Click the button.
53 comments
"Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day; teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
This video was the best explanation of any question I've seen. At least for me, it was the perfect explanation.
Thank you!
Is there a way to know the analysis on this question and questions where JY walks us through? I want to be able to see what PT this came from and the level of difficulty, because this definitely felt like a lv 3 or 4.
can somone clarify why D is wrong. I know he went into detail but I am still a little confused
What's a good general working definition of the word "principle" throughout the LSAT?
Should I be watching these full breakdowns if I am consistently getting the answers correct in the practice questions and when I look at the question before watching the video?
Off topic subject. On average, how long do you guys study for? I try to do at least an hour every day but juggling my coursework with this is challenging. I'm taking the LSAT in June. How are you guys holding up?
This question is great to also mention how two answers may seem identical in a sense but there's always something about one of those answers that has less assumptions. With C we are talking about making better nutritional choices against sweet commercials on TV. With B we are talking about physical exercise and health with sweet commercials. Which would make the most sense to you. Of course it would be the nutritional choices against sweet commercials because we are talking about that same set (food).
got it right but i felt like i was on a roller coaster trying to read the stimulus
Not gonna lie...just the word childrearing messed me up lol
"I like normal buts" 😅
For people like me who write down the "review" portion of every lesson, copy and paste the transcript of the lesson in ChatGPT and ask to format a review for information pertaining to MSS questions (or whatever is being covered) and not pertaining to the specific question itself.
#feedback It would be helpful to have a difficulty comparison with the average LSAT q on these. I get a really good handle on these example q's in the lessons, but do not want to be overconfident when approaching real drill sets :)
Ive done a few prep test prior to doing these LR courses and I'm seeing so many questions that I've done.
Can someone please clarify to me why B is not also an equally appropriate answer? In my understanding, both answers B and C serve to "protect" children from "some form of harm" whether the harm is unhealthy foods or deceptive television advertisements.
Normal buts 🤭
how do we do all this with time constraints
#help
In the lesson, J.Y. says “All soft drinks and candies? No – the soft drinks and candies advertised on television shows directed towards children.” This being the case, it seems to me the reason that B is wrong is not because it is about television advertisements but because B talks about “deceptive and misleading,” and the stimulus does not do this. But what if B were something like, “that television advertisements can lull one into making poor choices”? B would then align with the fact that we are talking about soft drinks and candies advertised on television.
It should be noted that the domain for the principle in the stimulus is "childrearing."
So is the strategy for these questions to not look at the answers first, and "guess" what the right answer is ? #help#feedback
Correct me if i'm wrong but ". And" is a grammatical error right?
Just remember folks.....You should always immerse yourself into the stimulus and try not to bring a whole lot of outside knowledge to the question.
I honestly picked "D" rather than "C" because of my former personal trainer occupation.
Oops....
"there's nothing wrong with normal buts"
he's so real for this