flaw is concluding that /A-->/B from the premise that A-->B
Any advice or insight on breaking out of the high 150s low 160s? Last 5 PTs taken weekly have been 160, 162, 160, 158, and 158. Been going through the curriculum blind reviewing and reviewing PTs the next day. Also haven’t started studying reading comprehension nor do I review it during the review process of the test. Looking to take in September and trying to get 165+
To be honest I got rid of the most rule right off the hop, because it would be impossible to infer anything that must be true based off of a most relationship. Especially since there are no other most relationships in the stimulus
Cows are the the most widesread form of livestock in north america. Though they may not be the most optimal for farming and argiculture, it is not worth switching since it would be too costly, even if the alternative form of livestock may be more efficient
Curriculum is great, but just going to echo what I have been seeing: give us more You Try's and let us see the passage up front, as well as the questions and answer choices. It helps with engagement
2
Here's my low res: corporation debate; moral vs economic
Is there any advice for getting better at those 4/5 difficulty questions? I have a tough time with them, and no matter how long I spend reading and re reading these questions it is hard for me to decipher between the answer choices, and what makes the right one right, and wrong ones wrong.
Kevin with the cheeky insert: "i got that from chatgpt by the way 😏"
Is skipping over dashes to get he core of a sentence always a good idea? when should you or should not do it?
Completely read this wrong. I thought it meant that if you drink alcohol "on balance" in other words meaning a moderate amount, then it would be good. Not the overall benefits of alcohol.
anyone else pressing the space bar tp play the video and just confused as hell where the other audio was coming from?