Hi all, in the RC Analytics / Question Types there is a category labeled "WSE" but it doesn't explain what the acronym stands for. Can you please enlighten me?

Thanks!

Hi, I just finished this practice test and was very confused about why the answer to this question is E.

The stem is asking which of the following, if true, most weakens the argument. The argument can be summarized by the following: if a medieval epistemologist believed something, then it belongs to the broader category of medieval epistemology and vice versa.

The correct answer is: "there is much debate as to which medieval thinkers, if any, were epistemologists." The answer I chose is (paraphrased): some medieval epistemologists had beliefs that contradicted those of other medieval epistemologists.

Who cares if the first one is true? It's true that there is a debate, not that there for certain are no medieval epistemologists. Whereas, if the answer I chose were to be true, it introduces a clear contradiction (where X and not X are true at the same time). Could anyone help explain this? Thank you.

Hello!

I've recently started to use 7sage to study for the LSAT. Im a rising junior in undergrad and do not know where to start. I plan on taking the LSAT sometime in the winter of 2024/25. I am also a first-gen student, so I feel like I have no guidance. I have read up on many LSAT reddit posts, but I am unsure if I should be "doing more" with studying. As of now, my current plan is to study for the whole summer and try to fit it into my academic schedule in the fall. How often should I be doing drills and prep tests? I am currently going through the foundations portion of the syllabus.

Anything helps!

Thank you :)

Hi there-- I am looking for study buddies in person (Fairfax VA or DMV area) or remote. Let me know if you'd like to get together!

Hello, I am contemplating a lot if I should take the June 2024 LSAT. I have started studying since Jan 2024 however my study schedule has not been consistent to the point that I still need 15 hrs left of the core curriculum and I have not been able to take any practice tests to see where I am at. I really want to get a high score at least 165 +. Should I wing it on the final chance I can do logic games or should I prep more for the August LSAT???

I’m looking to study for the August and September lsat test. Is there a practice test I should take as a diagnostic for the new version of the test? Thanks!

I'm debating whether or not I go through the foundations section to study for the August 2024 LSAT. It seems like a lot of the information would only be helpful for logic games?? Like for example the "Conditional and Set Logic" and "Logic of intersecting sets" sections don't seem like they would be any help on a test that has no LG. Any opinions on this would be great!

I am feeling overwhelmed and stressed with my first lsat exam coming up next week. I don't feel very prepared and i feel alone in this process. I think i am becoming mentally drained and taxed from studying and not seeing results I want. i am super busy and a undergraduate playing soccer and working. I have been studying for 6 months for the june lsat 3 days a week for 2 plus hours. Im not sure if im studying wrong. i take practice exams twice a week. Is reviewing and doing the drills the best way i learn i feel like the way im studying now isnt working and i would like to try somthing new for when i take the lsat exam in November. im tyring to decide if i should just cancel the june lsat and take my first one in novmber or at leat take it and get some exprience im not sure.

Hello everyone,

I am looking to form a dedicated study group with fellow test-takers who are aiming to score 160+ within the next two months and ultimately reach 170 and above by the end of this year. If you are serious about achieving a high score and are committed to studying full-time or part-time, this group is for you! The focus will be on Reading Comprehension (RC) and Logical Reasoning (LR), with separate groups meeting on different days to ensure comprehensive practice and focused study sessions. We will meet online via Google Meet, twice or three times a week.

This study group will offer a collaborative learning environment where we can support and motivate each other to ensure that every single member achieves a high score. We will engage in regular practice sessions, share resources and study materials, and provide constructive feedback and discussion. I am looking for individuals who are committed to studying full-time or part-time, aiming for a score of 160+ within the next two months, and are serious and motivated learners who can actively participate and contribute. Those applying for the next fall term are especially welcome, as we can work together towards our common goal.

I am in the Pacific Time Zone and can dedicate time from 9 AM to 4 PM every weekday.

If you are interested in joining this study group and are ready to work hard to achieve your goals, please reach out to me with a brief introduction about yourself, your current score range, and your availability. Let's work together to achieve our target scores!

Hi,

I notice that when I get a question wrong on a practice test, I usually miss the next one too. Wondering if this is by design or if its just me. Has anyone else ever noticed this?

There have been some questions about how to approach studying for the new LSAT format! If you're wondering about the difference between PTs 1–94 and PTs 101–158, here's a post walking you through it.

I know this all might be a little confusing! Feel free to comment below if you have any questions.

I've created an active LSAT study group exclusively for Black individuals seeking to excel in the legal field. Let's leverage our collective strengths and experiences to conquer the LSAT together. If you're committed to pursuing legal education and want to study in a supportive and empowering environment, join us! Together, we'll sharpen our skills and achieve our goals. Reach out if you're ready to embark on this journey with fellow Black scholars! ATTENTION: verification process required upon entry.

https://discord.gg/w9zyxcQb

Where can I find pinned questions completed during LR problem sets? When I go to the analytics page, under pinned responses, I only see pinned responses from completed practice tests. I have pinned some questions that I answered under the assumptions module for LR, and those do not appear here.

Hello all!

I am in the beginning of my LSAT Journey if I can qualify as that. I recently purchased my 7sage membership but previously used Mike Kim's book.

I was supposed to take the LSAT in February but ended up postponing it for June 2024 as I was really struggling to improve during my winter break as quick as I wanted. I am now in a bit of a bind because I postponed the test for June 2024 and experienced various health complications during the semester which made me have to focus more on my classes in order to catch up and I stopped studying for the LSAT.

I am now done with my semester and I am about a week out of the June LSAT and I am still scoring in the 148-152 range. Does anybody have any advice to help me progress or get easy points using 7sage or else ?

I also plan on taking the August LSAT, for this I will have more time to study over the summer so I believe that I will do way better. However, what should I do for June ? I still want to attempt it. My worse section is Logic Games, followed by LR. I'm doing just okay with reading comprehension.

Thank you so much.

I initially made an account without lawhub advantage, but I just went and upgraded today- 7sage is still telling me I don't have an active subscription & can't access any of the preptests. Has anybody else had this problem? I was in the middle of taking a test and really want to get back to it asap....

Keep getting this message when I try to use the autobuilder. I'm giving it like 20 tests to pull from and a bunch of question types, what's wrong? #help

Hi everyone, I'm taking the LSAT on June 7 remotely. I received the email from LSAC today saying that the LSAT Writing has opened up. Admittedly, I hadn't done much research on the LSAT Writing up until today, but this sentence in the email struck me: "Given the large volume of test takers, we strongly encourage you to complete your LSAT Writing as soon as it becomes available." I sort of scrambled today to figure out how to approach the LSAT Writing section, but I couldn't find anything on 7Sage or on the LSAT Reddit saying that there is a "better" day to take the writing section, or that taking it earlier is better. Is there something I'm missing? Is it better to take it earlier because there might be more proctors available? I don't really know anyone that has taken the LSAT or is a lawyer, so any insight is much appreciated, thanks!

For some reason my drills have been expiring way before the time is up. I was doing a timed section and 9 minutes into the drill stated I ran out of timed and kicked me out mid game. Please fix this error.

Admin note: Edited title. Please do not post threads or comments in all caps. This is against the Forum Rules. Thanks!

I started 7Sage about two and a half weeks ago (I know still very early on-just want some tips) and have started prepping for the LR section of the LSAT for the new version after August, hopefully taking the LSAT for the first time in october. I started with some of the foundations as well. I began the theory and approach lessons which explain the question types and give examples of each, as well as examples for you to do throughout the lessons. Anyway, when I finish with those I start drilling with the lessons and tips in mind. I started the MSS lessons and now have been drilling through the clean questions. I always watch every explanation video for the ones I got wrong and read over the ones I got right to mimic the strategy.

My questions:

Is it normal to have a high varying range of wrong answers between timed drill sets at the beginning? For example, I will do 10 questions to start off in one set since I am very new to this and get -5 on one then -3 on another, maybe -6, -4, then oddly I'll get all of them right and it restarts. Somehow, my main common score is always getting -5. Either way, it's such a weird range and I have no idea where I am at or how to gauge this. I know there are gaps because I just started but what are your tips? Even though it's still early shouldn't I be improving at least a little?

Did you find drilling or lessons more valuable and how do I know what's best for me? Did you watch every foundational video or focused on specific lessons and then drilled right after?

Hi! For some reason 7Sage is not allowing me to access the drills and prep tests even though I have purchased the law hub advantage subscription. On law hub it ways that my account is active, so I'm not sure how to connect it. Any help would be appreciated!

Hello there, I have just purchased the core plan a few days ago. However I am wanting to refund the subscription. I have come to find out that I must have LawHub advantage to simply have access to 7sage. I would rather just use the LawHub Advantage, how can I do this?

7Sage used to have the pdf option in their problem sets and practice tests. I can't find it anymore! Am I missing something? Thank you! #help

Does anyone know if they will be posting the recording from the June study group? I was at work at the time, so I missed it.

I figured since there is no explanation video on this one, I'd offer my two cents. Please feel free to respond if my explanation is lacking anything or if you have a better one.

So the correct AC is B and here is why. The stimulus tells us that essentially that scientists relying on social reasons like prestige is not actually a bad thing when they are accepting arguments because social reasons are used to influence every human endeavor. The reason why this is the flaw is because it essentially relies on the fact that this justification is used so often as a valid reason to justify this claim. We know this because social reasons are stated to influence every human behavior, highlighting the frequency of use. The principle behind this argument is "if a justification is used frequently then the justification is valid. But obviously this is not true, just because a justification is used frequently it doesn't mean it is at all a valid way of supporting the argument. I mean we can even use real life examples to really highlight how wrong this claim is. Human emotions also influence every human endeavor, does that mean scientists are justified in accepting scientific arguments based on human emotions and is it right that doing so isn't detrimental? Of course not, doing so would lead to so many biases and flawed groundless conclusions.

I'll also disprove C because it seems to be a popular AC. The reason why this is not the correct AC is because it is not the flaw. This AC is saying that the argument does not consider the fact that these scientists in addition to relying on social reasons also consider relevant evidence when accepting these claims. This actually sounds like it is strengthening the argument. Now we have evidence that these scientists are not just blindly accepting arguments based on social reasons and that there is actually some actual definitive evidence behind these justifications.

This is how I explained this question to myself, I'm curious to know your thoughts.

Hello! I recently purchased both an LSAC LawHub Advantage subscription and a 7Sage subscription. while my accounts were registered as linked, 7Sage is not recognizing my purchase of the LSAC subscription. i have received a receipt for both subscriptions as well.